Age-related effects on osteoclastic activities after orthodontic tooth movement

Abstract

ObjectivesTo elucidate the effects of age on the expression levels of the receptor activator of the nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoclasts in the periodontal ligament during orthodontic mechanical loading and post-orthodontic retention.Materials and MethodsThe study included 20 male Sprague-Dawley rats, ten in the young group (aged four to five weeks) and ten in the adult group (aged 18 to 20 weeks). In each rat, the upper-left first molar was subjected to a seven-day orthodontic force loading followed by a seven-day retention period. The upper-right first molar served as a control. The amount of orthodontic tooth movement was measured after seven-day force application and seven-day post-orthodontic retention. The expression levels of RANKL and the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts were evaluated on day 7 (end of mechanical force loading) and day 14 (after seven days of post-orthodontic retention). Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test, and significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the amount of tooth movement in the young group (0.96, standard deviation (sd) 0.30mm) and that in the adult group (0.80mm, sd 0.28) (p > 0.05) after the seven-day force application. On the compression side, the expression of RANKL and TRAP-positive osteoclasts in both the young and the adult groups increased after the application of force for seven days, and then decreased at the end of the seven-day retention period. However, by the end of the period, the expression of RANKL on the compression side dropped to the control level in the young group (p > 0.05), while it was still higher than that on the control side in the adult group (p < 0.05). The expression of RANKL on the compression side did not show significant difference between the young and the adult groups after seven-day force application (p > 0.05), but it was significantly higher in the adult group than that in the young group after seven-day post-orthodontic retention (p < 0.05). Similarly, the decreasing trend of TRAP-positive osteoclasts during the retention period in the adult group was less obvious than that in the young group.ConclusionsThe bone-resorptive activity in the young rats was more dynamic than that in the adult rats. The expression of RANKL and the number of osteoclasts in adult rats did not drop to the control level during the post-orthodontic retention period while RANKL expression and the number of osteoclasts in young rats had returned to the baseline.Cite this article: X. Li, M. Li, J. Lu, Y. Hu, L. Cui, D. Zhang, Y. Yang. Age-related effects on osteoclastic activities after orthodontic tooth movement. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:492–499. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0004.R2.

Different effects of soybean isoflavone genistein on transforming growth factor levels during orthodontic tooth movement among young and old rabbits

“…The rising number of adults demanding orthodontic treatment presents a new challenge. A previous study found that adults alveolar bone remodeling is much slower than in juveniles due to decreased cellular activity and vascularity, this suggests that orthodontic treatment duration may be longer in adults due to a delay in orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) 5 .…”

Effect of carbonated hydroxyapatite incorporated advanced platelet rich fibrin intrasulcular injection on the alkaline phosphatase level during orthodontic relapse

“…Osteoblast activity was elevated indicated that there is a new bone formation. To prevent relapse, osteoblast is required to consistently stimulate bone formation [15]. Osteoblasts consequently fill the trenches and tunnels of bone in the surfaces of the bone formed by osteoclasts, through generating novel bone matrices within them and initiate bone apposition [16].…”

Three-dimensional analysis of the physiologic drift of adjacent teeth following maxillary first premolar extractions

“…Johnston’s research 34 reported that excess growth of the mandible during this period would lead to mesial drift of the maxillary molars to establish a stable molar relationship for dentoalveolar compensation, which could explain why the upper molars of younger patients drifted mesially to a greater degree after premolar extraction. Moreover, the age-related effects on tissue reaction 57 , the proliferative rate of PDL cells 58 , osteoclastic activities 59 and mineral density in alveolar tissues 60 could explain the greater drift in the younger population.…”