2001
DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and Learning-Specific Changes in Single-Neuron Activity in CA1 Hippocampus During Rabbit Trace Eyeblink Conditioning

Abstract: Aging and learning-specific changes in single-neuron activity in CA1 hippocampus during rabbit trace eyeblink conditioning. J Neurophysiol 86: 1839 -1857, 2001. Rabbit trace eyeblink conditioning is a hippocampus-dependent task in which the auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) is separated from the corneal airpuff unconditioned stimulus (US) by a 500-ms empty trace interval. Young rabbits are able to associate the CS and US and acquire trace eyeblink conditioned responses (CRs); however, a subset of aged rabbits… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
76
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
6
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past analyses of hippocampal information processing in aged animals have focused either exclusively on cells of the CA1 subregion Shen et al, 1997;McEchron et al, 2001; or have combined the data obtained from the CA1 and CA3 subregions for analytical purposes Oler and Markus, 2000;Wilson et al, 2003Wilson et al, , 2004Wilson et al, , 2005. In studies of aging that did analyze subregions separately (Mizumori et al, 1996;Mizumori and Kalyani, 1997), the experimental conditions for recordings were not suitable for detecting the distinctive features of CA1 and CA3 encoding in response to changes in the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past analyses of hippocampal information processing in aged animals have focused either exclusively on cells of the CA1 subregion Shen et al, 1997;McEchron et al, 2001; or have combined the data obtained from the CA1 and CA3 subregions for analytical purposes Oler and Markus, 2000;Wilson et al, 2003Wilson et al, , 2004Wilson et al, , 2005. In studies of aging that did analyze subregions separately (Mizumori et al, 1996;Mizumori and Kalyani, 1997), the experimental conditions for recordings were not suitable for detecting the distinctive features of CA1 and CA3 encoding in response to changes in the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wholecell recordings revealed that the apamin-sensitive current in CA1 neurons, which contributes to the afterhyperpolarization, was significantly greater in SK2-overexpressing mice than in WT mice. The increase in the apamin-sensitive current in CA1 may affect neuronal excitability at the soma and subsequently affect learning and memory (Disterhoft et al, 1988;McEchron et al, 2001;Oh et al, 2003). A second and more direct mechanism by which SK2 channels may affect the induction of synaptic plasticity is via a Ca 2Ï© -mediated feedback loop between NMDARs and SK channels in the dendritic spines of CA1 neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, galanin specifically reduced freezing on the cued components of trace fear conditioning. Cued freezing in the trace fear conditioning test is thought to depend on the integrity of both the amygdala and the hippocampus (LeDoux et al 1990;Moyer et al 1990;Sutherland and McDonald 1990;Phillips and LeDoux 1992;McEchron et al 1998McEchron et al , 2000McEchron et al , 2001Weiss et al 1999;Davis and Whalen 2001;Ryou et al 2001;Schafe et al 2001). Specifically, both the galanin administered rats, and the galanin-overexpressing transgenic mice exhibited a deficit only in the particular aspect of the conditioning procedure that requires both amygdala and hippocampal mediation to a single discrete stimulus (trace cued fear).…”
Section: Kinney Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate that the cognitive impairments produced by galanin are consistent across two species, and across exogenous and endogenous manipulations, on specific components of fear conditioning. The addition of a delay between the CS and US has been used in a variety of investigations of hippocampal learning and memory (McEchron et al 1998(McEchron et al , 2001Weiss et al 1999;Huerta et al 2000;Ryou et al 2001). Delays ranging from 0.5 sec to >30 sec have been employed.…”
Section: Kinney Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation