2019
DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2019.1617222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agroecology and La Via Campesina II. Peasant agroecology schools and the formation of a sociohistorical and political subject

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
13

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…These horizontal processes can have an intentionally multi-scalar character (e.g., spread from one locality to another and from the local to the international level). For example, La Via Campesina has been developing and systematizing social learning processes, including agroecology schools, in and between different territories and regions of the world [69,70].…”
Section: Enabling Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These horizontal processes can have an intentionally multi-scalar character (e.g., spread from one locality to another and from the local to the international level). For example, La Via Campesina has been developing and systematizing social learning processes, including agroecology schools, in and between different territories and regions of the world [69,70].…”
Section: Enabling Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food sovereignty, for its part, places peasants as the central collective political meta-subject destined to produce and provide food to society ("Food sovereignty gives us the hope and power to preserve, recover and build on our food producing knowledge and capacity. Food sovereignty is the right of peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems" [9] (p. 1)), defying the corporate food regime's agri-food model, its territorial impacts, and its ideological framework [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Literature Review: Political Formation and The Ideological Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the concept of food sovereignty, peasants are (re)signified and attributed multiple meanings associated with the defense of territories, agroecological practices, small-scale production, local markets, the non-commodification of natural resources, resistance and struggle for access to land, the defense of ancestral seeds, the protection of common goods, sustainable production, and appropriate science and technologies [19,20]. The notion of "agroecological peasantry" is developed around that of food sovereignty [9][10][11][12], and processes for productive and cultural "re-peasantization" are promoted, both in peasant organizations and within the collective political narrative of the Food Sovereignty Movement (FSM) [21].…”
Section: Literature Review: Political Formation and The Ideological Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nivel macroeconómico: lo rural en América Latina El análisis de la cuestión rural resulta un tema recurrente en el desarrollo de las ciencias sociales y los estudios latinoamericanos, más aún la relevancia de la caracterización del sujeto "campesino/a" en la exploración de la dinámica agraria ha alentado el surgimiento de múltiples miradas políticas, económicas y sociológicas del hecho rural en América Latina (Rosset y Martínez Torres 2012). En gran medida, el debate que atraviesa a las indagaciones del mundo rural, como hemos señalado, ha puesto en cuestión la supuesta extinción de la noción de "campesinado" (Bernstein et al 2018) en tanto adquieren relieve quienes integran esa multiforme categoría de campesino (Rosset et al 2019;Bretón 2013). No obstante, entre los análisis económicos, productivos y sociológicos de la ruralidad latinoamericana, existe un intersticio de tiempo y acción que genera inquietudes teórico-políticas; sobre esas inquietudes se ubica el conjunto de interrogantes que nos introducen a nuestro análisis: el campesinado en clave de organización social y política territorial (Shanin 1979;Nogueira 2017).…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified