2015
DOI: 10.5897/ajar2015.10515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomic and technical fibers traits in elite genotypes of cotton herbaceous

Abstract: The changes in weaving technology, competition with synthetic fibers, and the globalization of cotton and textile production have increased the demand for better quality fibers. One of the main traits to be improved is fiber length. Thus, under the hypothesis of distinction and characterization of cotton genotypes, the aim of this study was to evaluate, in three locations, the average behavior of elite breeding lines selected for long fiber, as the agronomic and fiber technological trait. It were evaluated lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
1
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The F test revealed a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between cotton genotypes for all agronomic (Table 1) and technological (Table 2) traits, which allowed for the inference of existing genetic variability between genotypes (Table 1). The coefficient of variation was inferior to 20% of all the evaluated traits, as it was similar to those obtained in published papers studying cotton (Freitas, Leandro, & Carvalho, 2007;Araújo et al, 2013;Jerônimo et al, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2015a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, Rodrigues, & Teodoro, 2015bCarvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016bQueiroz et al, 2017a;Santos et al, 2017). No significant G x E interaction was observed for the evaluated traits, which indicates similar phenotypic performance for the traits in these three environments.…”
Section: Joint Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The F test revealed a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between cotton genotypes for all agronomic (Table 1) and technological (Table 2) traits, which allowed for the inference of existing genetic variability between genotypes (Table 1). The coefficient of variation was inferior to 20% of all the evaluated traits, as it was similar to those obtained in published papers studying cotton (Freitas, Leandro, & Carvalho, 2007;Araújo et al, 2013;Jerônimo et al, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2015a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, Rodrigues, & Teodoro, 2015bCarvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016bQueiroz et al, 2017a;Santos et al, 2017). No significant G x E interaction was observed for the evaluated traits, which indicates similar phenotypic performance for the traits in these three environments.…”
Section: Joint Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar results were observed by Carvalho et al (2015b), when evaluating 36 cotton elite inbred lines in three environments did not observed GxE interaction for all agronomical and technological traits evaluated. Because of the presence of GxE interaction for three traits, we chose to study the genetic diversity among cotton cultivars separately in each environment and investigate the interaction impact on the diversity among genotype pairs.…”
Section: Joint Analysis Of Variance and Cultivar Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These values are lower than those observed in other studies on cotton crop (Souza et al, 2006;Suinaga et al, 2006;Hoogerheide et al, 2007;Silva Filho et al, 2008;Moiana et al, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2015a). According to Cruz et al (2014), for continuously distributed phenotypic traits, CV e values lower than 20% reflect excellent experimental accuracy.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%