2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm for evaluating layer thickness based on electron average energy shift analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also reliant on an algorithm for evaluating layer thickness, this new WES method is based on an average energy shift analysis of electrons that was developed by our group and published in 2012 [13]. The WES method exploits the attenuated electron peak counts in XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) rather than use the signal electron peaks emitted from the sample (due to photon beam irradiation) and then calculate the mean electron energy loss.…”
Section: Wes (Wide Energy Spectrum) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also reliant on an algorithm for evaluating layer thickness, this new WES method is based on an average energy shift analysis of electrons that was developed by our group and published in 2012 [13]. The WES method exploits the attenuated electron peak counts in XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) rather than use the signal electron peaks emitted from the sample (due to photon beam irradiation) and then calculate the mean electron energy loss.…”
Section: Wes (Wide Energy Spectrum) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous work focused on the interactions that occur during the process of the electrons' transport [33,34]. This study presents calculations of the electrons' energy deposition efficiency to the metal alloy using EGS5 simulations, which were validated by thermal experiments performed using an Arcam Q20+ machine (Arcam, Mölndal, Sweden).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observation of successful applications reported in the literature for overlayer and substrate systems is that such methods are typically useful over rather narrow energy ranges close to an isolated photoelectron peak where inelastic mean free paths can be considered constant or simple corrections applied and interfering peaks do not cause additional complications. Simple methods to translate average electron energy loss into material thickness have already been demonstrated for 10‐keV electrons, providing some optimism that a straightforward method of describing XPS backgrounds is possible …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%