2017
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2017.10853abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms and Authenticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While algorithm aversion traditionally refers to the phenomenon of avoiding reliance on algorithmic systems after witnessing their performance or errors [e.g. 8,22,23], other studies have revealed negative attitudes even prior to a confrontation with the system [9,10,24]. Extant research suggests that algorithm aversion specifically manifests itself when algorithmic systems assume tasks that are considered innately human [25], are considered subjective [9,18], and might benefit from human intuition [6].…”
Section: Attitude Toward Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While algorithm aversion traditionally refers to the phenomenon of avoiding reliance on algorithmic systems after witnessing their performance or errors [e.g. 8,22,23], other studies have revealed negative attitudes even prior to a confrontation with the system [9,10,24]. Extant research suggests that algorithm aversion specifically manifests itself when algorithmic systems assume tasks that are considered innately human [25], are considered subjective [9,18], and might benefit from human intuition [6].…”
Section: Attitude Toward Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, an original writing style that provides more than what is rationally required, makes an author stand out [37]. In contrast, algorithms are attributed a lack of originality, authenticity, and creativity due to their lack of conscience [22,38]. Furthermore, positive effects of disclosed algorithmic authorship on the perception of content, and hence indications for perceptions of suitable capabilities of algorithms, have only been shown in data-driven domains [1].…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests not only that technologies are patterned by shifting perceptions in fairness in decision-making, but also that the broader trust humans have in algorithms is not stable (Glikson & Woolley, 2020) and is constantly evolving (for some recent empirical explorations, see Jago, 2017;Schafheitle et al, 2020). For instance, the perception of bias in algorithmic decision-making may be weak during the initial introduction of an algorithmic technology, but may become stronger as the system is used (or vice versa).…”
Section: Understanding Algorithms and Organizational Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large streams of research have looked into how individuals respond to digital technologies [6][7][8][9][10][11], and more recently algorithms [12]. While theses studies offer valuable insights of how users react to algorithms in making relatively "safe" decisionsi.e., those surrounding which either risk is low or technology is better understoodless is known about how clients respond to a service like robo advisory in a real-world setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study contributes to extant literature in several ways. Besides information systems [13,] [20], there is a growing literature in management [21], [12], [5] and strategy (e.g. [22]) interested in the changes that algorithms and predictive analytics are inducing for firms, particularly in knowledge-intensive contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%