2015
DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2015.1040477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alienvs.Predator: interactions between the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni) and the Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni)

Abstract: Data collected onboard two South Korean longliners in 2011-2014 targeting Antarctic toothfish provided insights into trophic interactions between two Antarctic top predators: the colossal squid Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni and the Antarctic toothfish Dissostichus mawsoni. Adults of each species opportunistically prey upon weakened representatives of the other species: squid will feed on longlinecaught toothfish, and toothfish on dying and dead squid. The highest occurrence of squid attacks was recorded in the Da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blue shark, the shortfin mako and the bigeye thresher (Alopias superciliosus) are the most commonly bycaught shark species in the Cypriot pelagic longline fishery (Department of Fisheries andMarine Research 2016 -2021). The very limited published information on squid depredation mentioned the depredation by the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni) on longlines targeting the Antarctic toothfish in the Southern Ocean (Remeslo et al, 2015) and by the purpleback flying squid (Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis) on gillnets targeting tuna in the Northern Arabian Sea (Moazzam, 2019). However, squid depredation has never been reported before in the Mediterranean fisheries.…”
Section: Onboard Observations: Identification Between Depredating Spe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blue shark, the shortfin mako and the bigeye thresher (Alopias superciliosus) are the most commonly bycaught shark species in the Cypriot pelagic longline fishery (Department of Fisheries andMarine Research 2016 -2021). The very limited published information on squid depredation mentioned the depredation by the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni) on longlines targeting the Antarctic toothfish in the Southern Ocean (Remeslo et al, 2015) and by the purpleback flying squid (Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis) on gillnets targeting tuna in the Northern Arabian Sea (Moazzam, 2019). However, squid depredation has never been reported before in the Mediterranean fisheries.…”
Section: Onboard Observations: Identification Between Depredating Spe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GAB squids with high d 15 N values were at the second highest trophic level, just below the colossal squid Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni from the Southern Ocean. Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni is the heaviest known invertebrate (Rosa et al, 2017) and is thought to consume Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni, Remeslo et al, 2015), which, in turn, are high-trophic-level predators of mid-to largesized cephalopods and fishes (Queiroś et al, 2021). Additionally, the similarities between the GAB squid FAs and FA profiles from other large, actively predatory squid species including giant squid Architeuthis dux, Antarctic flying squid Todarodes filippovae, flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii, whiplash squid Idioteuthis cordiformis, and arrow squid Nototodarus gouldi suggest roles as active pelagic predators.…”
Section: Trophic Role and Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moroteuthopsis longimana and Psychroteuthis glacialis, and octopuses, e.g. Pareledone turqueti and Stauroteuthis gilchristi (Collins et al, 2007;Fenaughty et al, 2003;Jo et al, 2013;Remeslo et al, 2015;Roberts et al, 2011;Stevens et al, 2014;Yoon et al, 2017). The Antarctic toothfish, like its close relative the Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides, can be found down to depths of c. 2,200 m and it is a sedentary species with individuals not moving between areas in a short time period (Hanchet et al, 2008(Hanchet et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%