2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All Men with Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction Require a Cardiovascular Workup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in diabetic and cardiovascular highrisk patients (Framingham Risk Score), an ABI of < 0.9 may be associated with and be predictive for ED [23]. In line, cardiovascular risk stratifi cation in patients with suspected ED using the Framingham Risk Score is promoted by some in order to determine the diagnostic work-up [24].…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only in diabetic and cardiovascular highrisk patients (Framingham Risk Score), an ABI of < 0.9 may be associated with and be predictive for ED [23]. In line, cardiovascular risk stratifi cation in patients with suspected ED using the Framingham Risk Score is promoted by some in order to determine the diagnostic work-up [24].…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a glucose and lipid profi le testing is recommended. Of note, testing of testosterone levels is particularly recommended in patients with failed PDE-5 inhibitor treatment [24]. Testosterone levels < 200 ng/dl are considered low and supplementation may be considered [25].…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] The absence of CAC is conclusive of minimal to no risk of ASCVD in the following 10-years. The presence of CAC may help guide the clinician regarding appropriate primary prevention therapy and certainly is one of the strongest discriminatory tests for the intermediate risk patient in CVD risk stratification.…”
Section: Cac Potential Role In Ed Management: Level Of Evidence = 1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New guidelines have attempted to address the shortcomings of older risk models. ED guidelines such as Princeton III have attempted to utilize evidence-based evaluation to further stratify men for cardiovascular (CVS) risk following the utilization of keen history taking and traditional risk models to establish the presence of predominantly vasculogenic ED and the volume of subclinical atherosclerotic burden which are markers for subsequent CVS events of MI and CVA in men [7,8]. These guidelines are an attempt to elaborate the following questions: [9] Is a history of ED a harbinger for future cardiovascular risk?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines give a level IIa recommendation but with class C evidence to consider cardiovascular risk assessment in men with ED. 9 Other expert groups have proposed stress test evaluation in men with ED and intermediate risk; 10,11 however, more clinical trial evidence is Vascular Medicine 23 (1) needed before implementing cardiovascular testing in men with ED without any clinical cardiovascular symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%