2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alleviating the Incompatibility Between Cross Entropy Loss and Episode Training for Few-Shot Skin Disease Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several improved skin lesion-classification methods based on FSL have also been introduced, containing multiperspective improvements on vanilla methods. Liu et al introduced an embedding-based comparison method improved from RelationNet, 18 Zhu et al proposed a novel loss-function calculation named queryrelative loss over meta-learning, 19 Li et al and Prabhu et al raised a similar issue of focusing on clustering methods using category judgment in feature maps, 20,21 and Mahajan et al proposed an enhanced convolution strategy, ie, groupequivariant convolutions (G-convolutions) to alleviate classification error brought about by data augmentation, such as rotations and reflections. 22 However, these studies were limited to nonuniversal approaches or few disease classes.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several improved skin lesion-classification methods based on FSL have also been introduced, containing multiperspective improvements on vanilla methods. Liu et al introduced an embedding-based comparison method improved from RelationNet, 18 Zhu et al proposed a novel loss-function calculation named queryrelative loss over meta-learning, 19 Li et al and Prabhu et al raised a similar issue of focusing on clustering methods using category judgment in feature maps, 20,21 and Mahajan et al proposed an enhanced convolution strategy, ie, groupequivariant convolutions (G-convolutions) to alleviate classification error brought about by data augmentation, such as rotations and reflections. 22 However, these studies were limited to nonuniversal approaches or few disease classes.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDD-Net focuses on feature-level improvement, with the application of the developed extraction and fusion strategy, which makes it possible to utilize almost all the current FSL methods, rather than improvement only in specific tools, such as metric learning-based methods 16,20,21 or meta-learning-based methods. 18,19 To test our method, we built a large skin disease dataset, Derm104, with 104 classes of skin lesions, which provides a large benchmark for skin disease FSL classification. It merges 1781 self-collected images from a public skin disease atlas website (www.med126.com/pf) and 2702 images from the public dataset SD-198, 23 for a total of 4483 images.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common solution is few-shot learning (FSL), which aims to learn transferable knowledge on common classes (base classes) and apply it to the rare ones (novel classes) with only a handful of labeled data. Current FSL methods for few-shot skin disease classification can be broadly divided into two groups: meta-learning based (Prabhu et al, 2019;Mahajan et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020Zhu et al, , 2021Singh et al, 2021) and transfer-learning based (Guo et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2021;Medina et al, 2020;Phoo and Hariharan, 2020). In the category of meta-learning-based methods, existing solutions are mainly based on MAML (Finn et al, 2017) and Prototypical Networks (Snell et al, 2017), with the focus on different problems in rare skin disease classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to implement a similar self-distilling strategy on an unsupervised base dataset, though, is not obvious. On the other hand, we are aware of only few methods [34,12,18,21] for FSL of medical image classification, and to the best of our knowledge, all of them relied on heavy labeling of the base dataset, causing a great burden for practical applications. Lastly, the meta-learning process and the target task are often isolated in most existing FSL approaches, and the meta-learner has little knowledge about its end task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%