2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Bayesian accounts of autistic perception: comment on Pellicano and Burr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
165
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
165
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The former are more likely to mediate an influence of contextual information on perception. We can therefore speculate that the group differences observed in the present study reflect individual variation in the expected levels of sensory precision (Friston et al, 2013;Hohwy, in press;Paton et al, 2012; see also Brock, 2012;Pellicano & Burr, 2012). In particular, the greater tendency of the low AQ group to draw on the illusory context to estimate arm position, as suggested by greater proprioceptive drift when the distance between the real and rubber arms was increased in the synchronous stimulation condition, may reflect an expectation for low precision of bottom-up sensory (proprioceptive) estimates within the unusual context of the illusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former are more likely to mediate an influence of contextual information on perception. We can therefore speculate that the group differences observed in the present study reflect individual variation in the expected levels of sensory precision (Friston et al, 2013;Hohwy, in press;Paton et al, 2012; see also Brock, 2012;Pellicano & Burr, 2012). In particular, the greater tendency of the low AQ group to draw on the illusory context to estimate arm position, as suggested by greater proprioceptive drift when the distance between the real and rubber arms was increased in the synchronous stimulation condition, may reflect an expectation for low precision of bottom-up sensory (proprioceptive) estimates within the unusual context of the illusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Frith, 1989;Happé & U. Frith, 2006), is the neurocognitive distinction between the contribution of bottom-up sensory processing to perception (relating most directly to sensory input) and the top-down modulation of input based on endogenous factors such as prior knowledge and attention (C. Frith & Dolan, 1997;Gilbert & Sigman, 2007;Kveraga, Ghuman, & Bar, 2007). More recent Bayesian accounts develop this point in relation to ASD explicitly: for example, Pellicano and Burr (2012) suggest that prior expectations regarding the state of the world may have diminished influence on perception in ASD, increasing reliance on bottom-up signals (for discussion and related proposals, see Brock, 2012;Friston et al, 2013;Hohwy, in press;Mitchell & Ropar, 2004;Paton et al, 2012;van Boxtel & Lu, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31,49]). That the typical perceptual effects of the RHI were exhibited by the ASD group thus suggests that individuals with ASD are able to learn informative priors but differ instead in the relative weighting of priors against conflicting sensory signals (see [9,12,13] for discussion). This is consistent with the mixed evidence on visual illusions in ASD, which tends to suggest that prior information influences visual perception in ASD but to a lesser extent than controls [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it has been argued that a single explanation at the cognitive, neural, or genetic level might be intractable [51,52,53]. However, interest in a potentially unifying account has recently re-emerged while making reference to and drawing upon the Bayesian brain hypothesis and particularly the predictive processing and active inference scheme [16,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. In the following, we direct our attention to the discussion of this approach and its relevance for ASC.…”
Section: Traditional Views On Ascmentioning
confidence: 99%