2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative doffing strategies of personal protective equipment to prevent self-contamination in the health care setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of gown doffing method on self-contamination, however, is uncertain. Osei-Bonsu et al, [10] in a doffing simulation study involving disposable gowns, found that use of the CDC-recommended doffing sequence that includes removing the gown by pulling from the front was associated with fewer participants with any contamination by the surrogate microorganism Staphylococcus dermidis than use of the doffing sequence that includes removing the gown from the back (2 of 15 [13%] vs. 8 of 12 [70%]), but no difference was observed in the number of participants with any contamination by the fluorescent tracer (12 of 15 [80%] vs. 11 of 12 [92%]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of gown doffing method on self-contamination, however, is uncertain. Osei-Bonsu et al, [10] in a doffing simulation study involving disposable gowns, found that use of the CDC-recommended doffing sequence that includes removing the gown by pulling from the front was associated with fewer participants with any contamination by the surrogate microorganism Staphylococcus dermidis than use of the doffing sequence that includes removing the gown from the back (2 of 15 [13%] vs. 8 of 12 [70%]), but no difference was observed in the number of participants with any contamination by the fluorescent tracer (12 of 15 [80%] vs. 11 of 12 [92%]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risks of contamination during doffing can be due to an incorrect removal technique, improper handling and disposal of PPE, or by damaging PPE to expose HCWs. [1][2][3][4][5][6] HCWs endure extreme heat, long periods of standing during patient care and then remove PPE, which requires patience, attention and some unusual movements. Doffing is a physically rigorous task that demands flexibility, balance and constant vigilance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, deviations from recommended doffing protocol are common with self-contamination rates ranging from 13% to 90%. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Quantitatively, the amount of self-contamination that is clinically meaningful to transmit SARS-CoV-2 during doffing is not yet known. However, SARS-CoV-2 contamination of common objects in the intensive care unit (ICU) and wards, virus aerosolisation in a confined space or spread from asymptomatic infected persons is documented, implying a potentially high infection risk for medical staff and other close contacts even though the amount of viable virus could not be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to reports, the selfcontamination rate ranges from 46-90% while do ng PPE. (13,15) Therefore, in our clinical practice, when entering or leaving the contaminated area, each member of medical staff must be accompanied by another to watch for any possible contamination when removing the PPE. In Step 27, there were 11 (22.9%) participants who could potentially be contaminated when removing their gloves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%