2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07809-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Futures at the Mānoa School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to manage the combinatorial explosion in the number of scenarios which may arise from concurrently addressing several issues and drivers has led many teams to adopt the double uncertainty, grid or 2 × 2 matrix approach [9,45,[114][115][116][117], in which the two most important or most uncertain issues under analysis define the axes of a 2D futures' plane in which the resulting four quadrants provide alternative paths to explore. A different, but somehow related, approach relies on the observation that different teams dealing with different foresight questions even in different cultural contexts often converge towards a small number of themes, or future "archetypes" [9,11,[115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129]. In applied foresight exercises, often these archetypes are plotted on a 2 × 2 plane or may naturally emerge from the choice of the double uncertainty axis, which results is a certain overlap between the archetypes and grid approaches [4][5][6]9,12,13,123,[130][131][132].…”
Section: Analysis: Interpreting Our Results Within Common Narratives mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to manage the combinatorial explosion in the number of scenarios which may arise from concurrently addressing several issues and drivers has led many teams to adopt the double uncertainty, grid or 2 × 2 matrix approach [9,45,[114][115][116][117], in which the two most important or most uncertain issues under analysis define the axes of a 2D futures' plane in which the resulting four quadrants provide alternative paths to explore. A different, but somehow related, approach relies on the observation that different teams dealing with different foresight questions even in different cultural contexts often converge towards a small number of themes, or future "archetypes" [9,11,[115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129]. In applied foresight exercises, often these archetypes are plotted on a 2 × 2 plane or may naturally emerge from the choice of the double uncertainty axis, which results is a certain overlap between the archetypes and grid approaches [4][5][6]9,12,13,123,[130][131][132].…”
Section: Analysis: Interpreting Our Results Within Common Narratives mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these characteristics, an inductive scenario method was applied with inspiration on the stepwise Manoa Approach [12,13]. The applied approach was adapted to the fact that besides the technical requisites above, there were context and human constraints.…”
Section: Development Of Global Future Scenarios and Identification Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned here that a worst-case or best-case scenario do not necessarily exist, since in every 'disaster' there are always 'winners' and 'losers' , and utopias probably remain impossible dreams. All scenarios can be 'positive' to those who prefer them and negative to those who don't (Dator, 2009).…”
Section: Archetypes and London's Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this future, governments, educational systems and organizations aim to build a vibrant economy, and develop the people, institutions and technologies to keep the economy growing and changing, forever (Dator, 2009). …”
Section: Archetypes and London's Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation