1989
DOI: 10.1109/19.39034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguity groups and testability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest algorithm is the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC), although Bayesian Networks (BN), used mainly in the analysis of industrial systems [7] and Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [8] are applied as well. Finally, distance-based approaches make decision about the fault of the SUT by calculating the distance between the symptoms' vectors forming the dictionary (data set L containing n labeled vectors of m symptoms -see (2)) and the actual set of measured symptoms s a .…”
Section: Diagnostic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simplest algorithm is the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC), although Bayesian Networks (BN), used mainly in the analysis of industrial systems [7] and Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [8] are applied as well. Finally, distance-based approaches make decision about the fault of the SUT by calculating the distance between the symptoms' vectors forming the dictionary (data set L containing n labeled vectors of m symptoms -see (2)) and the actual set of measured symptoms s a .…”
Section: Diagnostic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…how the premises were used to draw conclusions) is required. The most popular diagnostic methods, exploited in practice, are Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) [1,2]. This paper presents the taxonomy, structural and operational details of ANN used for the diagnostic purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Therefore, the normalized error plots for these devices, shown in Fig. 4, are also identical; equivalently, both devices belong to the same ambiguity group [7], [8].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a CUT with components (1 ≤ ≤ ), fault modeling is to determine the model parameters , , and for each according to (15), where parameters , , and are corresponding to , , and , respectively. In most actual analog cases, (14) is hard to derive from transfer function directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%