2006
DOI: 10.1248/jhs.52.568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amelioration by Vitamin A upon Arsenic Induced Metabolic and Neurotoxic Effects

Abstract: Arsenic effect was studied at two dosage levels (0.5 mg and 1 mg/kg) for 45 days in two regions of brain, viz., cerebral hemisphere (CH) and cerebellum (C) in adult mice. This study included the antioxidant profile namely superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, lipid peroxidation, reduced glutathione, ascorbic acid and total sulphydryl groups. Adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), succinic dehydrogenase (SDH), phosphorylase together with glycogen and protein levels were also estimated as metabolic indices in the br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, sodium arsenite might have generated free radicals (as revealed by the elevated levels of MDA) that overwhelmed the antioxidant defence system (as evident from the reduced levels of nonenzymatic [reduced glutathione and ascorbic acid] and enzymic antioxidants [superoxide dismutase and catalase]). The significant decrease in the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase of rats treated with sodium arsenite in the present study is similar to previous reports by Wu, Chiou, Wang, Hsueh, Wang, Chen, & Lee (), Bashir, Sharma, Irshad, Gupta, and Dogra () and Gopalkrishnan and Rao (). In contrast, the reduction in the level of MDA by AECDR is an indication that the AECDR effectively scavenged the free radicals generated from the sodium arsenite assault and consequently reduced lipid peroxidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, sodium arsenite might have generated free radicals (as revealed by the elevated levels of MDA) that overwhelmed the antioxidant defence system (as evident from the reduced levels of nonenzymatic [reduced glutathione and ascorbic acid] and enzymic antioxidants [superoxide dismutase and catalase]). The significant decrease in the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase of rats treated with sodium arsenite in the present study is similar to previous reports by Wu, Chiou, Wang, Hsueh, Wang, Chen, & Lee (), Bashir, Sharma, Irshad, Gupta, and Dogra () and Gopalkrishnan and Rao (). In contrast, the reduction in the level of MDA by AECDR is an indication that the AECDR effectively scavenged the free radicals generated from the sodium arsenite assault and consequently reduced lipid peroxidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The reduced activities of SOD, CAT and GPx observed in this study points out hepatic damage in the rats administered with SA, and is probably due to exhaustion of these enzymes to scavenge excessively-generated superoxide and hydrogen peroxides, respectively; in tumour cells (Manoharan et al, 2006). The reduced activity of SOD, CAT and GPx of rats treated with SA is in agreement with previous results (Bashir et al, 2006;Gopalkrishnan and Rao, 2006;Wu et al, 2001). Reduced activities of SOD, CAT and GPx in erythrocytes have been reported in cancer (Balasenthil et al, 2000).…”
Section: Groupsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present biochemical investigations in the NaAsO 2 treated group indicated significant elevation in plasma MDA and MPO values and reduction in CAT, SOD, GSH, and DNA parameters with DNA damage as typical signs of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation induced by As [33] [34]. There is growing evidence indicating that arsenic toxicity is a hallmark of the excess generation of intracellular ROS, such as superoxide anion (O 2 − ), hydroxyl radical (OH), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), which are responsible for oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation that play imperative roles in the biochemical alterations of cells [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%