1994
DOI: 10.2307/2160750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amenable Actions and Weak Containment of Certain Representations of Discrete Groups

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a countable discrete group F acting ergodically on a standard Borel space S with quasi-invariant measure p . Let n be a unitary representation of T on L2(S, dp, «#") "nicely" related with S. We prove that if T acts amenably on S then n is weakly contained in the regular representation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that if a non-singular action G (X, m) is amenable, then the Koopman unitary representation π of G on L 2 (X, m) is weakly regular [4,38]. (For the purposes of this paper, this is essentially all that one has to know about the amenability of a non-singular action.)…”
Section: Connes-sullivan Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that if a non-singular action G (X, m) is amenable, then the Koopman unitary representation π of G on L 2 (X, m) is weakly regular [4,38]. (For the purposes of this paper, this is essentially all that one has to know about the amenability of a non-singular action.)…”
Section: Connes-sullivan Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by constructing a sequence of functions (f n ) on Γ × Ω satisfying condition (h) of [2: Théorème 4.9].. For the case where Γ is the free group on two generators this is done explicitly in the appendix of [16]. See also [15]. More generally the arguments of [1] show how to do it for any hyperbolic group Γ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before we proceed to the proof, note that since by [1] the action of Γ on ∂Γ is amenable, and by [18], ergodic amenable actions lead to quasi-regular representations which are weakly contained in the regular representation, Proposition 2.4 applies to the matrix coefficients of boundary representations.…”
Section: Property Rdmentioning
confidence: 99%