2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aminostratigraphy of Middle and Late Pleistocene deposits in The Netherlands and the southern part of the North Sea Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for the Elsterian glaciation occurs throughout the northern part of the Netherlands and comprises widespread subglacial tunnel-valley systems, associated glaciolacustrine sediments (Peelo Formation) and occasional bodies of till (Zagwijn, 1989;Laban, 1995;Laban and van der Meer, 2011). The specific timing of the Elsterian glaciation is an increasingly controversial issue with opinions sharply divided between a conventional MIS 12 age (Zagwijn, 1996;Laban and van der Meer, 2011) or a younger MIS 10 age (Vandenberghe, 2000;Meijer and Cleveringa, 2009). Debate is centred upon the application of AAR dates to the Dutch sequence (Meijer and Cleveringa, 2009), and the precise timing and transport history relating to the input of volcanic tuffas from the Eifel volcanic region into the Rhine catchment (Boenigk and Frechen, 2006;Litt et al, 2008).…”
Section: Terrestrial Evidence 421 Pre Mis 12 Glaciationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for the Elsterian glaciation occurs throughout the northern part of the Netherlands and comprises widespread subglacial tunnel-valley systems, associated glaciolacustrine sediments (Peelo Formation) and occasional bodies of till (Zagwijn, 1989;Laban, 1995;Laban and van der Meer, 2011). The specific timing of the Elsterian glaciation is an increasingly controversial issue with opinions sharply divided between a conventional MIS 12 age (Zagwijn, 1996;Laban and van der Meer, 2011) or a younger MIS 10 age (Vandenberghe, 2000;Meijer and Cleveringa, 2009). Debate is centred upon the application of AAR dates to the Dutch sequence (Meijer and Cleveringa, 2009), and the precise timing and transport history relating to the input of volcanic tuffas from the Eifel volcanic region into the Rhine catchment (Boenigk and Frechen, 2006;Litt et al, 2008).…”
Section: Terrestrial Evidence 421 Pre Mis 12 Glaciationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific timing of the Elsterian glaciation is an increasingly controversial issue with opinions sharply divided between a conventional MIS 12 age (Zagwijn, 1996;Laban and van der Meer, 2011) or a younger MIS 10 age (Vandenberghe, 2000;Meijer and Cleveringa, 2009). Debate is centred upon the application of AAR dates to the Dutch sequence (Meijer and Cleveringa, 2009), and the precise timing and transport history relating to the input of volcanic tuffas from the Eifel volcanic region into the Rhine catchment (Boenigk and Frechen, 2006;Litt et al, 2008). The latter represents a key chronostratigraphic marker horizon with the Dutch Middle Pleistocene succession.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiometric techniques included thermoluminescence dating of heated flint artifacts, which yielded an age of 250 ± 20 ka (21), and electron spin resonance dating of shells, which yielded an age of 220 ± 40 ka, all converging to MIS 7 for the Maastricht-Belvédère interglacial (20). However, amino acid racemization dating of Corbicula shells from the interglacial deposits, as well as biostratigraphically important elements of the mollusk fauna itself, suggest an earlier age (i.e., MIS 9) for the Belvédère interglacial and its associated archeology (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, log 2): it was entirely fluvial in character (Table 2), with the exception of the single fragment of the terrestrial gastropod Azeca goodalli. Valvata piscinalis, the most abundant species in the sample, prefers relatively deep, moving water and is described by Meijer and Cleveringa (2009) as a fluvio-lacustrine species. Deep, moving water is also preferred by Pisidium amnicum and Pisidium henslowanum.…”
Section: Palaeozoology 321 Molluscamentioning
confidence: 99%