2003
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AML1/MTG8 oncogene suppression by small interfering RNAs supports myeloid differentiation of t(8;21)-positive leukemic cells

Abstract: The translocation t(8;21) yields the leukemic fusion gene AML1/MTG8 and is associated with 10%-15% of all de novo cases of acute myeloid leukemia. We demonstrate the efficient and specific suppression of AML1/MTG8 by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) in the human leukemic cell lines Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1. siRNAs targeted against the fusion site of the AML1/MTG8 mRNA reduce the levels of AML1/MTG8 without affecting the amount of wild-type AML1. These data argue against a transitive RNA interference mechanism potent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
129
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
129
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electroporation of Kasumi-1 cells with siRNAs was performed as described (Heidenreich et al, 2003;Dunne et al, 2006). Kasumi-1 cells were treated with different concentrations of HDAC inhibitors for 24 h: trichostatin A (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) dissolved in ethanol; suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA, USA) dissolved in methanol; entinostat (MS-275, SDX-275; kindly provided by Schering AG, now Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide; mocetinostat (MGCD0103, Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, valproic acid and phenylbutyrate (Sigma) dissolved in water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electroporation of Kasumi-1 cells with siRNAs was performed as described (Heidenreich et al, 2003;Dunne et al, 2006). Kasumi-1 cells were treated with different concentrations of HDAC inhibitors for 24 h: trichostatin A (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) dissolved in ethanol; suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA, USA) dissolved in methanol; entinostat (MS-275, SDX-275; kindly provided by Schering AG, now Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide; mocetinostat (MGCD0103, Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, valproic acid and phenylbutyrate (Sigma) dissolved in water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next studied the expression of LAT2 in an AML1/ ETO knockdown system (Heidenreich et al, 2003;Dunne et al 2006). Kasumi-1 cells were electroporated with a control siRNA (mock), with siRNA against AML1/ETO (siAGF1) or a mismatched siRNA control (siAGF6).…”
Section: Lat2 Is a Target Gene Of Aml1/etomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that these effects are due solely to inducing the degradation of the fusion protein, as these compounds also trigger death receptormediated apoptosis (Insinga et al, 2005;Sutheesophon et al, 2005) and inhibit chromosomal condensation before mitosis Johnstone, 2002;Piekarz and Bates, 2004). Indeed, siRNAmediated knockdown of RUNX1-ETO expression had only modest effects on the viability of Kasumi-1 cells over short periods of time, but allowed the cells to be forced to differentiate in response to various agents (Heidenreich et al, 2003;Kasashima et al, 2004). Antiacetylated histone H3 K9 and antiacetylated histone H4 were used to assess histone acetylation.…”
Section: Runx1-eto Degradation In Response Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the effect of AML1-ETO on hELA2 expression in Kasumi-1 cells, expression of AML1-ETO was knocked down using siRNAs as previously described (Heidenreich et al, 2003). Figure 5b illustrates that effective reduction of AML1-ETO expression in Kasumi-1 cells can be achieved within 48 h. This results in only a modest increase in hELA2 levels (Figure 5c).…”
Section: Aml1-eto Is Present At the Hela2 Promoter But Does Not Altermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORNs were 5 0 -CCUCGAAAUCGUACUGAGAAG-3 0 and 3 0 -UUG-GAGGCUUUAGCAUGACUCU-5 0 for AML1-ETO (Heidenreich et al, 2003). ORNs for AML1 were 5 0 -CCUCGAAGACAUCGGCAGAAA-3 0 and 3 0 -UUGGAG-CUUCUGUAGCCGUCUUU-5 0 .…”
Section: Chip Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%