2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amorphous carbons and extinction curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also hinted by the numerical tendency during the fitting procedure to go below the lowest limit of 5 nm in particle size, that is systematic for all the lines of sight in the MWG and in the MCs. Such small particles might be carbon mantle fragments, possibly produced during some destructive events (as discussed in the previous paragraph), such as e. g. nanodiamonds (Rai & Rastogi 2010, 2012Rai & Botet 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also hinted by the numerical tendency during the fitting procedure to go below the lowest limit of 5 nm in particle size, that is systematic for all the lines of sight in the MWG and in the MCs. Such small particles might be carbon mantle fragments, possibly produced during some destructive events (as discussed in the previous paragraph), such as e. g. nanodiamonds (Rai & Rastogi 2010, 2012Rai & Botet 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also hinted by the numerical tendency during the fitting procedure to go below the lowest limit of 5 nm in particle size, that is systematic for all the lines of sight in the MWG and in the MCs. Such small particles might be carbon mantle fragments, possibly produced during some destructive events (as discussed in the previous paragraph), such as e. g. nanodiamonds (Rai & Rastogi 2010Rai & Botet 2014).…”
Section: (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%