2010 53rd IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.2010.5548800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplifier gain enhancement with positive feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive feedback has been discussed previously in other literature . This work is an extension of our prior work by measuring the effects of positive feedback on the frequency response of CMOS amplifiers. Positive feedback is analyzed in a generic manner so that it can be applied to any circuit topology meeting the described criteria with the addition of a small feedback factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Positive feedback has been discussed previously in other literature . This work is an extension of our prior work by measuring the effects of positive feedback on the frequency response of CMOS amplifiers. Positive feedback is analyzed in a generic manner so that it can be applied to any circuit topology meeting the described criteria with the addition of a small feedback factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the presence of high parasitic capacitance, the resonant drive circuit fails to drive the parallel-plate actuator over its entire gap, although it is able to extend the operation range beyond the conventional pull-in point. To enhance the inherent negative feedback of the resonant drive circuit, we exploit the gain enhancement technique of an op-amp implemented with a positive feedback loop [51][52][53].…”
Section: Resonant Drive Circuit With Enhanced Inherent Negative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Baschirotto et al [ 20 ], designed a front-end using a single-ended amplifier as CSA. The circuit works at high frequency and very low voltage; however, the disadvantages of that circuit are high power consumption and high equivalent noise charge (ENC) which worsen the radiation-hardened behavior of the circuit [ 9 , 19 , 25 , 28 , 29 ]; furthermore, the circuit was prone to more parallel noise generated by the passive feedback resistor. The main problem in designing nuclear spectroscopy very large scale integration (VLSI) readout front ends is the execution of low-noise and low-power CSA, which guarantees high particles flux with the lowest pulse pile-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a good choice in the pulse shaping parameters is crucial for achieving good energy resolution and minimum pulse pile-up for high counting rates [ 11 , 30 , 31 ]. For high throughput experiments, short shaping time ( ) reduces the pile-up effects and for an optimal design solution, the minimum limits the charge collection process and increases the energy resolution accordingly [ 4 , 12 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to propose an optimal front-end circuit to avoid unnecessary power dissipation and heat in closely packed pixel arrays first avoid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%