2014
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2014.2321295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An 8T Low-Voltage and Low-Leakage Half-Selection Disturb-Free SRAM Using Bulk-CMOS and FinFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations have been carried out using HSPICE with 16‐nm CMOS predictive technology model (PTM) 24 . Based on this technology model file, the threshold voltages ( V th ) for NMOS and PMOS are 0.47965 V and −0.43121 V, respectively, and nominal V DD is 0.7 V. To assess the relative performance of the proposed cell, its various design parameters have been compared with those of recently proposed SRAM cells such as read‐/write‐enhanced 8 T (WRE8T), 25 half‐select free bitline sharing 10T (HFBS10T), 19 differential writing 10T (10 T‐P1), 6 single‐ended 11T (SE11T), 17 and write‐assist low‐power 11T (WALP11T), 23 as shown in Figure 7. For meaningful comparisons, a 256 × 16 array has been considered to measure design metrics of the SRAM cells.…”
Section: Simulation Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations have been carried out using HSPICE with 16‐nm CMOS predictive technology model (PTM) 24 . Based on this technology model file, the threshold voltages ( V th ) for NMOS and PMOS are 0.47965 V and −0.43121 V, respectively, and nominal V DD is 0.7 V. To assess the relative performance of the proposed cell, its various design parameters have been compared with those of recently proposed SRAM cells such as read‐/write‐enhanced 8 T (WRE8T), 25 half‐select free bitline sharing 10T (HFBS10T), 19 differential writing 10T (10 T‐P1), 6 single‐ended 11T (SE11T), 17 and write‐assist low‐power 11T (WALP11T), 23 as shown in Figure 7. For meaningful comparisons, a 256 × 16 array has been considered to measure design metrics of the SRAM cells.…”
Section: Simulation Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cell also suffers from degraded HSNM of HS cells. Similar write-approach has also been followed in single ended cell proposed in [100] as shown in Fig. 28c.…”
Section: ) Ground Cut-off/floating or Virtual Ground Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…28c. To alleviate the HS issue, the authors have employed a write-back technique with low area and power overheads [100]. The authors have modified this cell in [23] as shown in Fig.…”
Section: ) Ground Cut-off/floating or Virtual Ground Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] precisely points to applications of IoT and make use of stack transistor technique for further curtailing leakage. A few other surveyed methodologies for development of SRAM topologies for sustaining stability with decline in power dissipation include sleep NMOS [14,15], read buffers [16,17] and controlling swing voltage [18,19]. Topologies utilizing singleended read or single-ended write methodologies are particularly employed for the purpose of curtailing switching and leakage power along with minimizing chip area.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In carrying out simulation of proposed SRAM cell and its comparative analysis in this work, we have utilized cadence virtuoso tool and Generic Process Design Kit 45-nm process technology model file [26,27]. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with 4000 sample size have also been performed because the impact of process variations on the bit cell is also important to be analysed on certain parameters [14,28]. For investigating the impact of local variations, the variation in channel width (W), channel length (L), oxide thickness (t ox )and channel doping concentration [29] has been taken in to consideration.…”
Section: Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%