An Agenda for Competition Law and Policy in the Digital Economy

Akman, Pınar

doi:10.1093/jeclap/lpz055

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Yani and G. Widjaja, 2006). Merger dapat menjadi jalan keluar jika pelaku usaha mengalami kesulitan likuiditas, sehingga kreditor, pemilik, dan karyawan dapat terlindungi dari kepailitan (P. Akman, 2019).…”

Section: Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) D...unclassified

Konsekuensi dari Ekosistem Digital terhadap Regulasi Persaingan Bisnis di Indonesia dan Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Era Ekonomi Digital

NI MADE

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The era of the digital economy as it is today has demanded business people to carry out their business activities online. As a result, buyers will also make purchases online. It has implications for business competition. In this case, Law (UU) No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair business Competition has not accommodated the impact of the digital economy. So with that, this research has two objectives. The objectives are; First, to know the effect of the digital ecosystem on business competition law in Indonesia. Second, to see the role of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in the digital economy era in the event of unfair business competition. This research uses the type of juridical-normative research. The impact of the digital economy on business competition in Indonesia has resulted in a lot of abuse of the digital platform market. In this case, digital platforms are increasing with vertical business development. This business development increases the ability of digital platforms to collect more data, increase their competitiveness and become online shop owners and application users, so that the dominant position of digital platforms can be abused, for example, discriminating against competitors in retail, exclusivity agreements with consumers, and selling policies. With losses may result in competitors becoming uncompetitive in the market and leaving the market. Responding to these challenges, it is necessary to have a regulation that regulates in a more specific scope. This is because several countries in Europe have revised their business competition law regulations to protect business actors. In addition, as a form of responding to the challenges of the times that have changed the direction of the economy and online business. Of course, the government and business actors must work together to achieve good goals for the parties who will have an impact.

show abstract

Section: Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) D...unclassified

Konsekuensi dari Ekosistem Digital terhadap Regulasi Persaingan Bisnis di Indonesia dan Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Era Ekonomi Digital

NI MADE

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Faktanya, kompetensi otoritas memiliki beberapa kekuatan dan alat terluas yang dapat dimiliki oleh otoritas pengelola. (Akman: 2019) [15] Point of View ini sebenarnya berdasarkan pada analisis secara global. Lalu, yang menjadi pertanyaan sampai saat ini, perlukah KPPU dan Pemerintah merombak UU No.…”

Section: Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) D...unclassified

Dampak Ekosistem Digital terhadap Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia serta Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) di Era Ekonomi Digital

Sabirin

Herfian

2021

KPPU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Era ekonomi digital seperti saat ini, telah menuntut para pelaku bisnis untuk melakukan kegiatan usahanya secara daring. Akibat dari itu, para pembeli juga akan melakukan pembelian secara daring. Hal ini, implikasinya akan berdampak pada persaingan usaha. Undang-Undang (UU) No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan usaha Tidak Sehat dalam hal ini belum mengakomodasi terkait dampak ekonomi digital. Maka dengan itu, penelitian ini memiliki dua tujuan. Adapun tujuan tersebut adalah; pertama, ingin mengetahui dampak ekosistem digital terhadap hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Kedua, ingin mengetahui peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) di era ekonomi digital jika terjadi persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Adapun penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis-normatif. Akibat dari ekonomi digital terhadap persaingan usaha di Indonesia yaitu banyak terjadinya penyalahgunaan pasar platform digital. Dalam hal ini platform digital meningkat dengan pengembangan bisnis vertikal. Perkembangan bisnis ini meningkatkan kemampuan platform digital untuk mengumpulkan lebih banyak data, meningkatkan daya saingnya dan menjadi pemilik toko online dan pengguna aplikasi, sehingga posisi dominan platform digital dapat disalahgunakan, misalnya, mendiskriminasi pesaing di ritel, perjanjian eksklusivitas dengan konsumen, serta kebijakan menjual dengan kerugian yang dapat mengakibatkan pesaing menjadi tidak kompetitif di pasar dan meninggalkan pasar. Menjawab tantangan tersebut, maka perlu ada sebuah peraturan yang mengatur dalam lingkup yang lebih spesifik. Hal ini, mengingat beberapa negara di Eropa telah merevisi peraturan hukum persaingan usaha dengan tujuan untuk melindungi para pelaku usaha. Selain itu, sebagai salah satu bentuk dalam menjawab tantangan zaman yang mana telah mengubah arah perekonomian dan bisnis ke arah digitalisasi. Hal ini tentu Pemerintah dan para pelaku usaha harus bersinergi bersama demi mencapai tujuan persaingan usaha yang baik dan sehat. Kata Kunci: Ekosistem Digital, Hukum Persaingan Usaha, dan Optimalisasi Peran KPPU Abstract The era of the digital economy as it is today has demanded business people to carry out their business activities online. As a result, buyers will also make purchases online. It has implications for business competition. In this case, Law (UU) No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair business Competition has not accommodated the impact of the digital economy. So with that, this research has two objectives. The objectives are; First, to know the effect of the digital ecosystem on business competition law in Indonesia. Second, to see the role of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in the digital economy era in the event of unfair business competition. This research uses the type of juridical-normative research. The impact of the digital economy on business competition in Indonesia has resulted in a lot of abuse of the digital platform market. In this case, digital platforms are increasing with vertical business development. This business development increases the ability of digital platforms to collect more data, increase their competitiveness and become online shop owners and application users, so that the dominant position of digital platforms can be abused, for example, discriminating against competitors in retail, exclusivity agreements with consumers, and selling policies. With losses may result in competitors becoming uncompetitive in the market and leaving the market. Responding to these challenges, it is necessary to have a regulation that regulates in a more specific scope. This is because several countries in Europe have revised their business competition law regulations to protect business actors. In addition, as a form of responding to the challenges of the times that have changed the direction of the economy and online business. Of course, the government and business actors must work together to achieve good goals for the parties who will have an impact. Keywords: Digital Ecosystem, Competition Law, and Role Optimization KPPU.

show abstract

“…Digitalne platforme nerijetko sklapaju zabranjene sporazume koji narušavaju, ograničavaju ili eliminiraju konkurenciju koluzijom između poduzetnika. Sporazumi se smatraju štetnima za tržišno natjecanje ako uključuju takvu praksu kao što je dogovaranje cijena između konkurenata, ograničavanje proizvodnje ili nametanje cijene i drugih uvjeta prodaje, odnosno opskrbe posrednika nižeg stupnja (Akman, 2019). Algoritamsko određivanje cijena može olakšati sklapanje tajnih ugovora pojednostavnjivanjem nadzora i sankcioniranja odstupanja od tajnog sporazuma jer su transparentnost i brze promjene cijena faktori rizika tajnog dogovora (OECD, 2019;CMA, 2018).…”

Section: Utjecaj Digitalnih Platformi Na Tržišno Natjecanjeunclassified

“…S obzirom na širenje digitalne transformacije i učinke koje ima na poslovanje i trgovinu, potrebna je međunarodna suradnja i međunarodni zakonski okvir kojim bi se reguliralo tržište i osiguralo tržišno natjecanje. Međunarodna pravila osigurala bi jednak tretman svih sudionika na tržištu, potaknula bi tržišno natjecanje te bi olakšala međunarodnu razmjenu jer danas mnogo lanaca vrijednosti djeluje na međunarodnoj razini (Akman, 2019). Potreban je i okvir za međuinstitucionalnu suradnju jer je politika tržišnog natjecanja vezana uz mnoga druga područja.…”

Section: Slika 2 Nova Paradigma Analize Tržištaunclassified

“…Iako je prilagodba, odnosno izrada nove politike o tržišnom natjecanju potrebna, ipak tijela za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja ne trebaju odustati od postojećih analitičkih okvira koji su dosad dobro funkcionirali i za koje trenutno ne postoje zamjenski mehanizmi ili čak konceptualne alternative kojima bi se postigao cilj očuvanja tržišnog natjecanja (Akman, 2019). Tijela za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja trebala bi dati prioritet onim slučajevima u kojima intervencija može smanjiti prepreke ulasku na tržište.…”

Section: Slika 2 Nova Paradigma Analize Tržištaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Politika Tržišnog Natjecanja U Digitalnoj Ekonomiji

Franc

Zagrebu²

2020

Ekonomska misao i praksa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digitalna transformacija izvor je novih i izmijenjenih modela poslovanja koji mijenjaju tržišne uvjete. Digitalne platforme olakšavaju uključivanje u globalno tržište za poduzeća svih veličina, međutim, zauzimanje prevladavajućeg položaja na tržištu i zlouporaba tržišne moći digitalnih platformi česti su oblik narušavanja tržišnog natjecanja. Glavni je cilj ovog rada istražiti utjecaj djelovanja digitalnih platformi na tržišno natjecanje. Na temelju kritičkog pristupa i grupiranjem alternativnih stavova oko tržišne regulacije i natjecanja izrađen je model u kojem se ističu ključni problemi i potencijalna rješenja te širi efekti zaštite tržišnog natjecanja na digitalnom tržištu. Zaključak analize ukazuje da je prvenstveno potrebno razviti nove alate i kriterije za analizu tržišta, osigurati veći nadzor nad preuzimanjima, potaknuti dijeljenje informacija među sudionicima tržišta i s Vladom, revidirati pravila o javnoj nabavi te uvesti prilagođene standarde kvalitete. Naglašava se važnost poticajnog konkurentnog okruženja.

show abstract

An Agenda for Competition Law and Policy in the Digital Economy

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Konsekuensi dari Ekosistem Digital terhadap Regulasi Persaingan Bisnis di Indonesia dan Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Era Ekonomi Digital

Konsekuensi dari Ekosistem Digital terhadap Regulasi Persaingan Bisnis di Indonesia dan Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Era Ekonomi Digital

Dampak Ekosistem Digital terhadap Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia serta Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) di Era Ekonomi Digital

Politika Tržišnog Natjecanja U Digitalnoj Ekonomiji

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About