An agent-based framework for Informed Consent in the internet of things

Neisse, Ricardo; Baldini, Gianmarco; Steri, Gary; Miyake, Yutaka; Kiyomoto, Shinsaku; Biswas, Abdur Rahim

doi:10.1109/wf-iot.2015.7389154

Cited by 26 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The (Suo et al, 2012) says countries should implement new IoT-specific legislation to promote the development of IoT. IoT policies are associated with privacy mechanisms to guarantee safe authentication (Neisse et al, 2015). According to (Almeida, Goh, & Doneda, 2017) the principles in IoT must bring together different interests in an environment that must be effective and a legitimate governance framework.…”

Section: Discussion and Insightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to (Almeida, Goh, & Doneda, 2017) the principles in IoT must bring together different interests in an environment that must be effective and a legitimate governance framework. The IoT devices in an IoT system must manage and deploy privacy policies to control the flow of data to service providers (Neisse et al, 2015). According to (Chatfield and Reddick, 2018) at IoT, public policies consist of cybersecurity policies and digital technology policies and should behave as complements to each other (Chatfield & Reddick, 2018).…”

Section: Discussion and Insightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Deursen & Mossberger, 2018)(Weber, 2009)(Weber, 2013) (Wen et al, 2017) (Wirtz, Weyerer and Schichtel, 2018)(Wortmann & Flüchter, 2015) QC 3(Abobakr & A. Azer, 2017)(Almeida, Doneda and Moreira Da Costa, 2018)(Almeida, Doneda, & Monteiro, 2015)(Almeida, Goh, & Doneda, 2017)(Baldini et al, 2015)(Bowen et al, 2017)(Bowen, Cheung and Rohde, 2007)(Cervantes-Solis & Baber, 2017)(Chatfield & Reddick, 2018)(Dautov et al, 2018)(De Cremer, Nguyen, & Simkin, 2017)(Derhamy et al, 2015)(Keoh, Kumar, & Tschofenig, 2014)(Jayashankar et al, 2018)(Lainhart, Oliver, & Andrews, 2012)(Neisse et al, 2015)(Pereira, Benessia, & Curvelo, 2013) (Piccialli & Chianese, 2017)(Shen et al, 2018)(Shin, 2014)(Shin and Jin Park, 2017)(Soro et al, 2017)(Van Deursen & Mossberger, 2018)(Vlahogianni et al, 2016)(Yao, Sheng, & Dustdar, 2015) (Weber, 2009)(Weber, 2013)(Wen et al, 2017)(Wirtz, Weyerer, & Schichtel, 2018)(Wortmann & Flüchter, 2015) QC 4 (Abobakr & A. Azer, 2017)(Almeida, Doneda, & Monteiro, 2015)(Almeida, Doneda, & Moreira Da Costa, 2018)(Almeida, Goh, & Doneda, 2017)(Baldini et al, 2015)(Bowen et al, 2017)(Buyya & Vahid Dastjerdi, 2016)(Cao et al, 2016)(Carretero & García, 2014)(Cervantes-Solis & Baber, 2017)(Chatfield & Reddick, 2018)(Dautov et al, 2018)(Derhamy et al, 2015)(De Cremer, Nguyen, & Simkin, 2017)(Ding, Chen, & Yang, 2013)(Gubbi et al, 2013)(Jayashankar et al, 2018)(Keoh, Kumar, & Tschofenig, 2014)(Neisse et al, 2015)(Piccialli & Chianese, 2017)(Roman, Zhou, & Lopez, 2013)(Shen et al, 2018)(Shin, 2014)(Shin and Jin Park, 2017)(Soro et al, 2017)(Suo et al, 2012)(Truong et al, 2015)(Van Deursen & Mossberger, 2018)(Vlahogianni et al, 2016)(Yao, Sheng, & Dustdar, 2015)(Weber, 2009)(Weber, 2013)(Wen et al, 2017)(Wirtz, Weyerer, & Schichtel, 2018)(Wortmann & Flüchter, 2015) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Derhamy et al, 2015) Include users' privacy issues in IoT policies. (Neisse et al, 2015) Operational principles are aligned with IoT procedures. (Weber, 2013) Include cybersecurity and digital policies in IoT policies.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

IT governance enablers in relation to IoT implementation: a systematic literature review

Henriques

Pereira

Almeida

et al. 2019

DPRG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to obtain a list of recommendations addressed by the information technology (IT) governance enablers in relation to IoT implementation. The reason behind this it is the lack of information about these instances which could the organizations to be more effective when implementing IoT. Design/methodology/approach The objectives will be obtained using the methodology – systematic literature review. Findings During the research, a list of recommendations was created on each IT governance enabler in relation to IoT implementation, showing the flaws that exist at the literature level for each enabler. Originality/value The state of art of this research is a creation of a list of recommendations according to IT governance enablers to be applied on an IoT implementation.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Insightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion and Insightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

IT governance enablers in relation to IoT implementation: a systematic literature review

Henriques

Pereira

Almeida

et al. 2019

DPRG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Particularly when there are multiple devices which collaboratively define the service, an overarching consent needs to be given by aggregating and consolidating different data sources and devices. As such, the typical approach is to define new dedicated elements in a typical IoT architecture such as Agents [33], Privacy proxies on the IoT supporting network [34] or by creating a specific, network discoverable, service for Privacy disclosure (such as the Privacy Assistant of CMU [35]). This is made more challenging by the fact that fact that many IoT applications are dynamic, have lose connectivity graphs and weak (if any) device identity.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards an Accountable Web of Personal Information: The Web-of-Receipts

Jesus

2020

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consent is a corner stone in any Privacy practice or public policy. Much beyond a simple ''accept'' button, we show in this paper that obtaining and demonstrating valid Consent can be a complex matter since it is a multifaceted problem. This is important for both Organisations and Users. As shown in recent cases, not only cannot an individual prove what they accepted at any point in time, but also organisations are struggling with proving such consent was obtained leading to inefficiencies and noncompliance. To a large extent, this problem has not obtained sufficient visibility and research effort. In this paper, we review the current state of Consent and tie it to a problem of Accountability. We argue for a different approach to how the Web of Personal Information operates: the need of an accountable Web in the form of Personal Data Receipts which are able to protect both individuals and organisation. We call this evolution the Web-of-Receipts: online actions, from registration to real-time usage, is preceded by valid consent and is auditable (for Users) and demonstrable (for Organisations) at any moment by using secure protocols and locally stored artefacts such as Receipts. The key contribution of this paper is to elaborate on this unique perspective, present proof-of-concept results and lay out a research agenda. INDEX TERMS Privacy, consent, accountability, web-of-receipts, personal data receipts.

show abstract

Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) for connected vehicles in smart cities

Safa

Mitchell

Maple

et al. 2020

Trans Emerging Tel Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many Experts believe that the Internet of Things (IoT) is a new revolution in technology that has brought many benefits for our organisations, businesses, and industries. However, information security and privacy protection are important challenges particularly for smart vehicles in smart cities that have attracted the attention of experts in this domain. Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) endeavor to mitigate the risk of privacy invasions, but the literature lacks a thorough review of the approaches and techniques that support individuals' privacy in the connection between smart vehicles and smart cities. This gap has stimulated us to conduct this research with the main goal of reviewing recent privacy-enhancing technologies, approaches, taxonomy, challenges, and solutions on the application of PETs for smart vehicles in smart cities. The significant aspect of this study originates from the inclusion of data-oriented and process-oriented privacy protection. This research also identifies limitations of existing PETs, complementary technologies, and potential research directions.

show abstract

An agent-based framework for Informed Consent in the internet of things

Cited by 26 publications

References 10 publications

IT governance enablers in relation to IoT implementation: a systematic literature review

IT governance enablers in relation to IoT implementation: a systematic literature review

Towards an Accountable Web of Personal Information: The Web-of-Receipts

Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) for connected vehicles in smart cities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About