2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of terrain properties and the location of surface scatterers from persistent scatterer interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, where sea cliffs are covered by vegetation, the manipulation of point clouds becomes more complex. It has largely been proven that vegetation cover on topographic surfaces surveyed using RS techniques often results in incoherent, and inaccurate representations of the actual slope morphology [60][61][62]. The Funding: This research was carried out in the frame of the Project "Landslide Susceptibility Analysis of Rocky Coasts in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy, Slovenia, Croatia)" supported by the University of Trieste, Italy, and the University of Udine, Italy.…”
Section: Joint Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, where sea cliffs are covered by vegetation, the manipulation of point clouds becomes more complex. It has largely been proven that vegetation cover on topographic surfaces surveyed using RS techniques often results in incoherent, and inaccurate representations of the actual slope morphology [60][61][62]. The Funding: This research was carried out in the frame of the Project "Landslide Susceptibility Analysis of Rocky Coasts in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy, Slovenia, Croatia)" supported by the University of Trieste, Italy, and the University of Udine, Italy.…”
Section: Joint Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, researchers have developed time series analysis, namely multi-temporal InSAR techniques, e.g., [28][29][30]. Permanent scatterer interferometry (PSI), which is one of these techniques and was first proposed by [28], defines scatterers as exhibiting stable scattering behavior over time; however, this technique is limited in nonurban areas because of the low PS density [31,32]. Unlike other PSI techniques, the Stanford method for persistent scatterers (StaMPS) can be used for all terrains because it uses the spatial correlation of the interferometric phase to detect surface deformations occurring in non-urban areas and does not require a temporal deformation model describing how the deformation changes over time [31,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method focuses on measuring the level of deformation associated with each of the persistent scatterers, which is a point of high density within an interferogram from a single main image. Therefore, this technique was developed for urban areas, which have more stable scatterers than mountains or forests with distributed scatterers [25]. In recent years, many PSI approaches have been developed and applied in many cases, such as PS-InSAR [26][27][28], Stable Point Network (SPN) [29], Interferometric Point Target Analysis (IPTA) [30][31][32], and Stanford Method of Persistent Scatterers (StaMPS) [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%