2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2621.2003.00690.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of water vapour diffusion in whey protein films

Abstract: The macroscopic aspects of moisture transmission in whey protein films were determined by measuring water vapour adsorption. A theoretical model was constructed in which two kinds of water vapour fluxes were considered: one originating from diffusion, whilst the other was a flux due to the gravitation drift of moisture. The comparison of theoretical and experimental results showed that only the diffusion process was present.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…determined the effective diffusion coefficients at 75% RH and 25 °C of a dried whey protein film from 6.5% whey protein concentrate dispersed in distilled water. The results for the effective diffusion coefficients with (2.58 to 3.19)·10 −9 cm 2 ·s −1 (5.1 ± 0.1)·10 −9 cm 2 ·s −1 and (9.3 ± 0.1)·10 −9 cm 2 ·s −1 were slightly lower or similar to the effective diffusion coefficients measured in the present study for whey protein films with no reaction time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…determined the effective diffusion coefficients at 75% RH and 25 °C of a dried whey protein film from 6.5% whey protein concentrate dispersed in distilled water. The results for the effective diffusion coefficients with (2.58 to 3.19)·10 −9 cm 2 ·s −1 (5.1 ± 0.1)·10 −9 cm 2 ·s −1 and (9.3 ± 0.1)·10 −9 cm 2 ·s −1 were slightly lower or similar to the effective diffusion coefficients measured in the present study for whey protein films with no reaction time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Likewise, in the case of agar/melanin nanoparticles composite films, the incorporation of low melanin-particle content did not result in WVTR changes, but at higher content, the WVTR increased. Whey protein-based materials are generally permeable or semipermeable to moisture penetration [25,52]. Although the WVTR of the melanin-modified films prepared here decreased (WVTR of WPC-0.5% and WPI-0.5%, 1483.53 ± 5.49 and 1490.49 ± 5.37 (g/(m 2 × Day)) respectively), as compared to unmodified samples (WPC-C and WPI-C -1712.64 ± 7.46 and 1618.57 ± 6.23 (g/(m 2 × Day)), respectively), they still exhibited weak water vapor barrier properties, lower than those reported in other studies [14,18,19,37].…”
Section: Water Contact Angle and Wvtrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in a decrease of WVP in the film made with MD (F.MD) because MD DE 20 presents smaller particle size than GA. Additionally, the lower WVP and moisture can be attributed to the lower percentage of glycerol used during F.MD formulation, which was 15.4 % (related to solids), compared to 25.2 % in F.GA and 22 % in F.GA/MD. The presence of glycerol, a hydrophilic plasticizer, favors water molecule adsorption (Yoshida et al 2003), thus provoking a higher WVP on the formulations containing higher concentrations of this component (Müller et al 2008). The WVP results found on the present study were lower than cassava starch-based films (40 g m −1 s −1 Pa −1 ×10 −11 ) and starch-polyethylene films (120 to 220 g m −1 s −1 Pa −1 ×10 −11 ) and comparable to cassava starch-based film with bentonite nanoparticles (8.3 40 g m −1 s −1 Pa −1 ×10 −11 ) (Jiménez et al 2012).…”
Section: Film Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%