1958
DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1958.11926094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to a Systematic Study of Ego Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary investigators, however, refute the notion of disguise and assert that the manifest dream content is the datum of interest (Breger, 196? ;Breger et al, 1971;Brenneis, 1976;Hall, 1953aHall, » 1953bHertz & Jensen, 1975;Sheppard & Karon, 1964;Sheppard & Saul, 1958). Dream reports are viewed as descriptions of an experience.…”
Section: Justification For Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary investigators, however, refute the notion of disguise and assert that the manifest dream content is the datum of interest (Breger, 196? ;Breger et al, 1971;Brenneis, 1976;Hall, 1953aHall, » 1953bHertz & Jensen, 1975;Sheppard & Karon, 1964;Sheppard & Saul, 1958). Dream reports are viewed as descriptions of an experience.…”
Section: Justification For Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was differentiated whether threat was directed towards the dreamer or towards others in the dream. The dreamer's tendency to "distancing" was taken into consideration by Sheppard and Saul (1958) and Sheppard (1963). It was suggested that the more the dreamer portrayed his or her impulses, urges, drives and other motivating forces, as not being part of himself or herself, the more he or she put them at a distance from his or her ego.…”
Section: Degree Of "Distancing"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saul and Sheppard (1956) developed a method for the quantitative estimation of hostility expressed in dreams. Various ego functions in the manifest dream were studied (Sheppard & Saul, 1958), and an ego rating system was supposed to reflect different degrees of ego awareness. The ego rating system demonstrated an advantage over clinical judgement (Sheppard, 1963).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19) ; analysis of thematic material, such as that suggested by Holt (1958), Schafer (1958), andWyatt (1958) , or (for dreams) by Sheppard and Saul (1958): scales based upon test batterics, such as that employed by Klopfer, Crumpton, and Grayson (1958) ; and, finally, scales based upon response to psychotherapy, such as that proposed by Christenson (1951) .…”
Section: University Of Michiganmentioning
confidence: 99%