2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of extended finite state machine test selection criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No empirical assessments were provided in the previous work reported by El‐Fakih et al. [22,23]. Besides, here, we also provide two novel assessments showing that there are no significant differences between the test suites coverage of different classes of EFSM and code faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No empirical assessments were provided in the previous work reported by El‐Fakih et al. [22,23]. Besides, here, we also provide two novel assessments showing that there are no significant differences between the test suites coverage of different classes of EFSM and code faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[22] and El‐Fakih et al. [23], respectively. In particular, in the first work [22], three (out of the five) EFSM‐based test suites considered in this paper are sorted (from best to worst) with respect to their coverage of code faults, and in the second work [23], the test suites considered in this paper are sorted with respect to their coverage of EFSM faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test sequence execution cost is measured by the length of test sequences. Although these are clearly approximation methods, for practical reasons such methods have been commonly used in a number of testing studies [14][15][16].…”
Section: Theorem 5 Given An Fsm Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first direction is automation (from the automation of certain operations to the introduction of automated control of technological processes). In particular, Petri nets [10], the methods of finite automata [11][12][13] and the assertion mechanisms are used for this purpose. The second direction is associated with the use of the methods of artificial intelligence and paying more attention not to simulating a control object, but rather to formalizing the driving activity of a person-operator [14][15][16].…”
Section: A G O R O B C H E N K Omentioning
confidence: 99%