2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of impact strength of the mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were noted in a study that evaluated the regions of the sheep mandible under two different (lateral and ventral) impact loading directions: Under lateral loading conditions, the mandibular angle had been determined to be the weakest region of the mandible, and molar and premolar regions were found more stronger than the angle region (16). In a finite element study, the mandibular angles and condylar necks were found to be the weak areas in the mandibular geometry (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were noted in a study that evaluated the regions of the sheep mandible under two different (lateral and ventral) impact loading directions: Under lateral loading conditions, the mandibular angle had been determined to be the weakest region of the mandible, and molar and premolar regions were found more stronger than the angle region (16). In a finite element study, the mandibular angles and condylar necks were found to be the weak areas in the mandibular geometry (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The biomechanical behaviour of the mandible under impact loads has been examined in a few studies. It was found that the mandibular regions have different biomechanical behaviour depending on the direction of load (16) and that some of them are weaker than others (16, 17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods for evaluating stiffness described in the literature use sheep (Alkan et al, 2007;Kovan, 2008) or synthetic mandibles (Fedok et al, 1998;Karoglan et al, 2006) as substrates for bone plate application. There are limitations, however, that prevent consistent and reliable comparison of results, including variation of plate fixation technique among trials and users, and coupling of plate behavior to variations in sheep or synthetic mandible structure.…”
Section: Dynamic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75% of fractures occur in males aged 20-30 (Ellis et al, 1985), and are often caused by physical assault; other causes include motor vehicle collisions, falls, and sports-related injury (Craig et al, 2008;Kovan, 2008). Certain fracture patterns predominate, in the mandibular angle and body, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of 75% of fractures occur in males aged between 20 and 30 (Ellis et al, 1985;Moore et al, 1985), and are often caused by physical assault. Other causes of fractures include motor vehicle collisions, falls, and sportsrelated injury (Craig et al, 2008;Kovan, 2008). For all these cases surgical repair proves most effective, with the goal of recovering the anatomical structure prior to the injury and thus restoring normal function.…”
Section: Clinical Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%