Volume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts a and B 2010
DOI: 10.1115/gt2010-22257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Attempt at Large Eddy Simulation for Combustor Modeling

Abstract: Large eddy simulation (LES) is recognized as a promising method for numerical simulation in combustion systems. A LES attempt in a model combustor has been made, and a few important issues including grid size, inflow condition, wall boundary conditions, physical sub-models and data sampling, have been carefully considered. It is found that the turbulence forcing with the vortex method at the air/fuel inlets does not affect the LES results for the present configuration and the turbulence can develop naturally i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turbulence is characterized by irregularity or randomness, diffusion, vortices and viscous dissipation, and involves a wide range of time and length scales. Despite the rapid development of computing power, large eddy simulations are limited to benchmark cases with relatively simple geometries, while direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows remain practical only at low Reynolds numbers [2][3][4]. It is particularly true for turbulent reacting flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turbulence is characterized by irregularity or randomness, diffusion, vortices and viscous dissipation, and involves a wide range of time and length scales. Despite the rapid development of computing power, large eddy simulations are limited to benchmark cases with relatively simple geometries, while direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows remain practical only at low Reynolds numbers [2][3][4]. It is particularly true for turbulent reacting flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%