2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14185171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automatic on Top Analysis of Single Scan Tracks to Evaluate the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Building Parameters

Abstract: The production of dense samples produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is mainly determined by the choice of the best combination of construction parameters. Parameter optimization is the first step in the definition of an LPBF process for new alloys or systems. With this goal, much research uses the single scan track (SST) approach for a preliminary parameter screening. This study investigates the definition of a computer-aided method by using an automatic on top analysis for the characterization of SSTs,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SSTs cross-sectional analysis involves a complex and time-consuming sample preparation procedure however the on-top evaluation is strongly affected by the operator error. To numerically evaluate the quality of a SST, an automatic computer-aided method was recently developed by the authors in a previously published work [ 60 ]. Although this approach still requires a DOE of bulk samples for full optimisation, a further streamlining of the procedure was enabled by Gheysen et al [ 59 ] and Bosio et al [ 61 ] who developed a method to derive the optimal hd value directly from SSTs.…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSTs cross-sectional analysis involves a complex and time-consuming sample preparation procedure however the on-top evaluation is strongly affected by the operator error. To numerically evaluate the quality of a SST, an automatic computer-aided method was recently developed by the authors in a previously published work [ 60 ]. Although this approach still requires a DOE of bulk samples for full optimisation, a further streamlining of the procedure was enabled by Gheysen et al [ 59 ] and Bosio et al [ 61 ] who developed a method to derive the optimal hd value directly from SSTs.…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been widely applied in the literature for a preliminary tuning of P and v [27,28]. In addition, an innovative algorithm implemented in a previous author's work [29] was used to quickly discharge parameters unsuitable for the bulk production. This algorithm is able to identify the most suitable P-v combinations by discarding the noncontinuous scans and considering the SSTs quality.…”
Section: Pbf-lbm Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, a wide range of P-v combinations was explored and reported in figure 4. The parameters not able to guarantee adequate bulk densification were rapidly discarded on the basis of on-top SST morphologies [29]. In particular, in figure 4, the conditions in which SSTs with strong discontinuities were obtained are marked in red and the conditions with low-quality indexes are indicated in orange.…”
Section: Laser-powder Interaction Study With Single Scan Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the power (P) and scan speed (v) values suitable for the bulk production and minimizing the time and powder needed, the SST approach was used. In order to further accelerate this first fine-tuning stage of the P and v parameters, a software developed by the authors in a previous work was used [30]. This software is able to identify the most suitable Pv combinations by discarding the noncontinuous scans and considering the SST quality just with a fast image analysis of the on-top morphology.…”
Section: Pbf-lb/m Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%