2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2015.7257129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective cooperative coevolution framework integrating global and local search for large scale optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…f) Cooperative Coevolution and Memetic Algorithms: Decomposition methods (see §II-B) and memetic algorithms are the two most widely used approaches to large-scale global optimization with algorithms from both categories ranked first in large-scale global optimization competitions [169,226,227]. To benefit from the advantages of both approaches, some authors suggest the use of memetic algorithms [125,126,191,207,213] or other hybrids [218] as component optimizers in a cooperative coevolution framework. The general approach is to decompose the problem into a set of lower dimensional subproblems using the methods described in §II-B, and optimize each component using a global search algorithm followed by an episode of local search.…”
Section: B) Choice Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…f) Cooperative Coevolution and Memetic Algorithms: Decomposition methods (see §II-B) and memetic algorithms are the two most widely used approaches to large-scale global optimization with algorithms from both categories ranked first in large-scale global optimization competitions [169,226,227]. To benefit from the advantages of both approaches, some authors suggest the use of memetic algorithms [125,126,191,207,213] or other hybrids [218] as component optimizers in a cooperative coevolution framework. The general approach is to decompose the problem into a set of lower dimensional subproblems using the methods described in §II-B, and optimize each component using a global search algorithm followed by an episode of local search.…”
Section: B) Choice Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general approach is to decompose the problem into a set of lower dimensional subproblems using the methods described in §II-B, and optimize each component using a global search algorithm followed by an episode of local search. Cao et al [207] proposed to use SaNSDE [228] followed by Solis and Wets' [222] on each component and adjust their search intensity/frequency according to their performance. Sun et al [213] also used SaNSDE as the global search operator followed by dedicated local search procedures for the separable and nonseparable components.…”
Section: B) Choice Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCEA framework is the decomposition approach. There are three main decomposition approaches, including random grouping [37] , static grouping [38] , and grouping based on variable correlation [39,40] . The advantage of random grouping over static grouping is that the random grouping is more likely to optimize the interactive variables together [7] .…”
Section: Cooperative Co-evolutionary Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In science and engineering, there are cases in which a search for the optimal solution in a large and complex space is required [1]. Traditional optimization algorithms, such as Newton's method and the gradient descent method [2], can solve the simple and continuous differentiable function [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%