2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-020-02825-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective Kriging-based approximation for structural reliability analysis with random and interval variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 2-dimensional examples, i.e., examples 1 to 5, the LSFs have been drawn to reflect the characteristics of the functions schematically (Figs. [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 2-dimensional examples, i.e., examples 1 to 5, the LSFs have been drawn to reflect the characteristics of the functions schematically (Figs. [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) will be extremely challenging if the problem is complex. Simulation methods such as Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) [7][8][9], or approximation methods [10][11][12] are brought up as the alternatives. The exact solution is accessible in MCS, but at the cost of generating too many samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice we would encounter a more general random and interval hybrid uncertain problem with the increasing complexity of practical engineering analysis problems. 42 A series of fruitful achievements for hybrid uncertainty analysis have been achieved in this area based on the Taylor expansions, 43,44 orthogonal polynomial expansions, 45,46 dimension reduction methods, 47 Kriging surrogate models, 48 and so on. The existing hybrid uncertainty analysis methods are generally based on nested schemes, in which the random and interval uncertainties are considered sequentially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach named projection-outline-based active learning (POAL) 11,12 has been proposed to sequentially select training points; however, POAL lacks robustness. Zhang 13 used a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker-based criterion to identify the paired qualified samples that reflect both interval and random variables. An adaptive boundary utilizing FORM and the Kriging model has been proposed to recognize the simulation domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%