2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.05.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient GC–IDMS method for determination of PBDEs and PBB in plastic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[8][9][10] Compared with external or internal standard methods, IDMS generally delivers greater accuracy and precision. 28) Multiple factors, such as matrix effects and water-soaking time, can also be considered reasons for the difference between values. The uncertainties for NMIJ values were significantly smaller than the NIQR, and this result indicates that the NMIJ can analyze target pesticides more precisely than the participants.…”
Section: Comparison Of Consensus and Nmij Reference Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[8][9][10] Compared with external or internal standard methods, IDMS generally delivers greater accuracy and precision. 28) Multiple factors, such as matrix effects and water-soaking time, can also be considered reasons for the difference between values. The uncertainties for NMIJ values were significantly smaller than the NIQR, and this result indicates that the NMIJ can analyze target pesticides more precisely than the participants.…”
Section: Comparison Of Consensus and Nmij Reference Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-treatment allows a complete dissolution of the polymer in an appropriate solvent, possibly at room temperature, in order to avoid the thermal degradation of BFR [11,12]. Alternatively, a solid-liquid extraction is often adopted along with a series of extraction procedures, such as those performed by shaking, ultrasonication, soxhlet, microwave extraction, pressurized solvent, and supercritical CO 2 [13][14][15][16][17]. In addition to GC-MS, other analytical techniques used after the sample pretreatment are high performance liquid chromatography coupled with MS or UV detector, infrared analysis, and GC with an electron capture detector [13,[18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom-up approach was applied to obtain measurement uncertainty value [4, 14,16]. The sources for uncertainty were weighing of sample, calibration graph, trueness and precision.…”
Section: Measurement Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%