2016
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2016.2574750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Elaborately Designed Virtual Frame to Level Aeromagnetic Data

Abstract: Aeromagnetic data are usually contaminated by lineto-line errors, which are most often visible as stripe patterns in a 2-D data map. Leveling is a critical step to eliminate these errors in data processing and interpretation. The conventional tie-line leveling technique involves control lines (tie lines) which are perpendicular to flight lines to extract the leveling errors. By contrast, there are also some other methods to level without the need for tie lines, which can save considerable survey cost. However,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The raw magnetic data was collected continuously by two magnetometers ( = 160 Hz), and the 2D magnetic contour map is produced by the Kriging interpolation in Figure 9. Four features are observed from the magnetic maps of raw data: 1) The measurement inconsistency between adjacent lines results in leveling errors [38], which is related to the attitude information of the drone; 2) A subtle linear trend exists along the profile from south to north; 3) The noise signal measured by magnetometer 1 is higher than the noise measured by magnetometer 2; 4) Only two magnetic anomalies are visible, other magnetic anomalies are masked. A lowpass filter with = 3 Hz was used to eliminate the high-frequency interference signal firstly, then the trend term was removed to subtract the regional geomagnetic field, the processed results are displayed in Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw magnetic data was collected continuously by two magnetometers ( = 160 Hz), and the 2D magnetic contour map is produced by the Kriging interpolation in Figure 9. Four features are observed from the magnetic maps of raw data: 1) The measurement inconsistency between adjacent lines results in leveling errors [38], which is related to the attitude information of the drone; 2) A subtle linear trend exists along the profile from south to north; 3) The noise signal measured by magnetometer 1 is higher than the noise measured by magnetometer 2; 4) Only two magnetic anomalies are visible, other magnetic anomalies are masked. A lowpass filter with = 3 Hz was used to eliminate the high-frequency interference signal firstly, then the trend term was removed to subtract the regional geomagnetic field, the processed results are displayed in Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hard to separate the leveling errors from differences. Furthermore, virtual tie lines (Huang and Fraser, 1999;Fan et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2018) are skillfully constructed to level geophysical data instead of tie lines.…”
Section: Tie-line Leveling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, other geophysicists focused on using long-wavelength components to level airborne magnetic data (Luo et al, 2012;White and Beamish, 2015). Furthermore, virtual tie lines (Huang and Fraser, 1999;Zhang et al, 2018) and cross-line frame (Fan et al, 2016) are skillfully constructed to level geophysical data instead of tie lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%