2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc01325k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electroforming-free mechanism for Cu2O solid-electrolyte-based conductive-bridge random access memory (CBRAM)

Abstract: In a CuxO solid-electrolyte-based CBRAM cell using an Ag top electrode, electroforming-free and electro-reset processes could be achieved at a specific ex situ annealing temperature of the solid electrolyte.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current‐versus‐voltage ( I – V ) curve for the conductive‐bridge‐neuron device exhibited the HRS, low resistance state (LRS), LRS, and HRS, when the applied bias between the top and bottom electrodes was scanned from 0 to 2.2 V, −1.8 V, and 0 V, similar to that of a CBRAM, with a V set of 1.7 V and V reset of −1.8 V, as shown in Figure 1d. [ 29–31 ] After forming process, the conductive‐bridge‐neuron device showed the on/off ratio of 6.91 × 10 2 at 0.1 V. The cumulative average voltage and standard deviation for the formation process were 1.66 and 0.21 V, respectively, whereas those for the set process were 1.64 and 0.18 V, respectively, indicating the reliable electrical characteristics of the neuron device, as shown in Figure S2, Supporting Information. In particular, to operate a conductive‐bridge‐neuron device performing integrate function, the negative differential resistance (NDR) region was selected, which means the integrate function of conductive‐bridge‐neuron device would be performed by the rupturing process of the conductive Cu filaments in the TiO 2 resistive layer, as shown in the green line of Figure 1d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current‐versus‐voltage ( I – V ) curve for the conductive‐bridge‐neuron device exhibited the HRS, low resistance state (LRS), LRS, and HRS, when the applied bias between the top and bottom electrodes was scanned from 0 to 2.2 V, −1.8 V, and 0 V, similar to that of a CBRAM, with a V set of 1.7 V and V reset of −1.8 V, as shown in Figure 1d. [ 29–31 ] After forming process, the conductive‐bridge‐neuron device showed the on/off ratio of 6.91 × 10 2 at 0.1 V. The cumulative average voltage and standard deviation for the formation process were 1.66 and 0.21 V, respectively, whereas those for the set process were 1.64 and 0.18 V, respectively, indicating the reliable electrical characteristics of the neuron device, as shown in Figure S2, Supporting Information. In particular, to operate a conductive‐bridge‐neuron device performing integrate function, the negative differential resistance (NDR) region was selected, which means the integrate function of conductive‐bridge‐neuron device would be performed by the rupturing process of the conductive Cu filaments in the TiO 2 resistive layer, as shown in the green line of Figure 1d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, inverse‐conical‐shaped Cu filaments would be produced in the TiO 2 resistive layer as the Cu ions diffused from the CuTe top electrode during sputtering of the top electrode, as shown in Figure 1b. [ 29–31 ] The surface roughness of the TiN bottom electrode was investigated by using atomic force microscope, as shown in Figure S1, Supporting Information. Several locations like a hillock were found in the area (1 μm 2 ) of the TiN bottom electrode, where a higher electric field would be applied at hillocks rather than valleys.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a precise design of the Cu ion concentration profile in an α‐chalcogenide alloy is crucial for achieving selector cell or conductive‐bridge‐random‐access‐memory (CBRAM) cell behavior and the presence or absence of a forming process. [ 22–28 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bi‐stable resistance of CBRAM was obtained by electroforming or a rupture of metal ion filaments in the resistive layer. [ 41–44 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%