2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-018-0839-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An emergency decision making method based on the multiplicative consistency of probabilistic linguistic preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, various emergencies have occurred all over the world, including accidents (such as chemical spills, explosions, and urban fires) and natural disasters (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and floods) caused by human negligence. These emergencies not only caused huge casualties and property losses, but also adversely affected public safety and social stability .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, various emergencies have occurred all over the world, including accidents (such as chemical spills, explosions, and urban fires) and natural disasters (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and floods) caused by human negligence. These emergencies not only caused huge casualties and property losses, but also adversely affected public safety and social stability .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang et al (2019) extended the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multiple criteria decision making) method with proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets to solve the mine EDM problem with partial weight information. To address the EDM with incomplete information and dynamic trends, two consistency‐based models were developed by Gao, Xu, Liang, and Liao () and Gao, Xu, Ren, and Liao () using incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations and probabilistic linguistic preference relations, respectively. For more effective EDM, Ding and Liu () reported a two‐dimension uncertain linguistic prospect theory‐VIKOR (VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOm‐promisno Resenje) approach, and Ding and Liu () presented a Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic zero‐sum game method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because emergency events are characterized by randomness, complexity, and uncertainty, it is difficult for conventional emergency measures to address them (Cai, Xu, Wang, & Chen, ; Ding & Liu, ). Therefore, the researches on emergency decision making (EDM) problems have gained increasingly attentions from both scholars and practitioners recently (Ding, Liu, & Shi, ; Gao, Xu, Ren, & Liao, ; Li & Wei, ; Y. Liang, Tu, Ju, & Shen, ; Zhou, Wang, Qin, Chai, & Gómez Muñoz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pang et al [11] thus introduced the probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS), which is capable of dealing with situations where probabilistic distributions cannot be acquired completely in reality, and is capable of carrying out probability information aggregation without a loss of information [24]. Since its introduction, PLTS has been successfully applied to solve practical MADM problems in various settings [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. As can be seen, these studies all only allow decision makers to depict their cognitive models through balanced linguistic terms sets (BLTS) [25] which are uniformly and symmetrically distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiang et al [42] studied an interactive venture capital group decision-making approach under the PLTS scenario, in which interactions among venture capitalists and entrepreneurs were considered to dynamically deduce weight information. To deal with emergency decision-making problems, Gao et al [43] developed an approach using probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs), where they equally synthesized subjective possibilities given by decision makers and objective possibilities which were obtained by case-based reasoning. Liao et al [38] proposed an LINMAP-based group decision-making method where the developed linear programming models were used to calculate the weights of evaluative attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%