2019
DOI: 10.1609/icaps.v29i1.3466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study of Perfect Potential Heuristics

Abstract: Potential heuristics are weighted functions over state features of a planning task. A recent study defines the complexity of a task as the minimum required feature complexity for a potential heuristic that makes a search backtrack-free. This gives an indication of how complex potential heuristics need to be to achieve good results in satisficing planning. However, these results do not directly transfer to optimal planning.In this paper, we empirically study how complex potential heuristics must be to represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seipp et al (2016) investigated the common benchmark domains Blocksworld (e.g., Slaney and Thiébaux 2001), Gripper (IPC 1998), Spanner (IPC 2014 and VisitAll (IPC 2011) theoretically for their correlation complexity and detected a correlation complexity of 2 for each of them. Additionally, Corrêa and Pommerening (2019) did an empirically study on lower bounds for the optimal correlation complexity i.e. the dimension required to express the perfect heuristic for a different set of common benchmark domains.…”
Section: Gray Counter Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seipp et al (2016) investigated the common benchmark domains Blocksworld (e.g., Slaney and Thiébaux 2001), Gripper (IPC 1998), Spanner (IPC 2014 and VisitAll (IPC 2011) theoretically for their correlation complexity and detected a correlation complexity of 2 for each of them. Additionally, Corrêa and Pommerening (2019) did an empirically study on lower bounds for the optimal correlation complexity i.e. the dimension required to express the perfect heuristic for a different set of common benchmark domains.…”
Section: Gray Counter Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I ∈ S fin (5) The final and most general variant follows the same idea as ∞DDA of "pruning" states with infinite heuristic value, but uses a second potential function to determine which states receive an infinite heuristic value. This was first suggested by Corrêa and Pommerening (2019) for the problem of representing the perfect heuristic h * as a potential function. They define heuristics h based on two potential functions h pot 1 and h pot 2 as follows:…”
Section: Dda Variants Without Aliveness Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incrementally Extending the Set of Subproblems Corrêa and Pommerening (2019) show that encoding the optimal heuristic usually requires considering a large number of small projections but only a small number of larger projections. (They consider potential heuristics which partition costs over projection heuristics.)…”
Section: Restricting the Considered Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%