An Evaluation of New Attachment Formation Using a Microfibhllar Collagen Barrier

Tanner, Michael G.; Solt, Charles W.; Vuddhakanok, Suchada

doi:10.1902/jop.1988.59.8.524

Cited by 42 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…31,[42][43][44][45] The mean PD reduction from these studies ranged from 3.1 to 5.5 mm in collagen-treated groups, while only 2.2 to 2.8 mm reductions were noted in controls. However, Tanner et al 41 showed no difference in clinical attachment gain when comparing collagen membranes to flap debridement alone. It should be noted that this study was done in only 4 patients with hopeless teeth, and results were obtained only at 3 months.…”

Section: Animal Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since the late 1980s, collagen membranes have been tested for their ability to promote regeneration in periodontal intrabony defects (Table 3). 31,[41][42][43][44][45][46] Most studies have shown significantly greater probing depth (PD) reduction, clinical attachment gain, and bone fill in collagen-treated groups than open debridement controls. 31,[42][43][44][45] The mean PD reduction from these studies ranged from 3.1 to 5.5 mm in collagen-treated groups, while only 2.2 to 2.8 mm reductions were noted in controls.…”

Section: Animal Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Collagen Membranes: A Review

Bunyaratavej

Wang

2001

Journal of Periodontology

466

396

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collagen materials have been utilized in medicine and dentistry because of their proven biocompatability and capability of promoting wound healing. For guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures, collagen membranes have been shown to be comparable to non-absorbable membranes with regard to probing depth reduction, clinical attachment gain, and percent of bone fill. Although these membranes are absorbable, collagen membranes have been demonstrated to prevent epithelial down-growth along the root surfaces during the early phase of wound healing. The use of grafting material in combination with collagen membranes seems to improve clinical outcomes for furcation, but not intrabony, defects when compared to the use of membranes alone. Recently, collagen materials have also been applied in guided bone regeneration (GBR) and root coverage procedures with comparable success rates to non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes and conventional subepithelial connective tissue grafts, respectively. Long-term clinical trials are still needed to further evaluate the benefits of collagen membranes in periodontal and peri-implant defects. This article will review the rationale for each indication and its related literature, both in vitro and in vivo studies. The properties that make collagen membranes attractive for use in regenerative therapy will be addressed. In addition, varieties of cross-linking techniques utilized to retard the degradation rate of collagen membranes will be discussed.

show abstract

Section: Animal Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Animal Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collagen Membranes: A Review

Bunyaratavej

Wang

2001

Journal of Periodontology

466

396

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Da sich trotz op timaler Mundhygiene bei einigen PD Patienten kein dauerhafter Therapieer folg einstellte und sich sowohl die Ent zündungen als auch die Läsionen nicht mit der Menge an bakterieller Plaque er klären ließen, entwickelte sich die spezifische Plaquehypothese. Sie postuliert die qualitativen Plaqueveränderungen und das Überwuchern von parodontalpatho genen Keimen als Auslöser der entzünd lichen Reaktion [28].…”

Section: Chronische Parodontalerkrankungenunclassified

Pathogenesis of parodontitis in rheumatic diseases

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inflammatory periodontal disease (PD) is a common disease worldwide that has a primarily bacterial aetiology and is characterized by dysregulation of the host inflammatory response. The degree of inflammation varies among individuals with PD independently of the degree of bacterial infection, suggesting that alteration of the immune function may substantially contribute to its extent. Factors such as smoking, education, and body mass index (BMI) are discussed as potential risk factors for PD. Most PD patients respond to bacterial invaders by mobilizing their defensive cells and releasing cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1beta, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and IL-6, which ultimately causes tissue destruction by stimulating the production of collagenolytic enzymes, such matrix metalloproteinases. Recently, there has been growing evidence suggesting an association between PD and the increased risk of systemic diseases, such ateriosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, stroke, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PD and rheumatologic diseases such as RA share many pathological aspects and immunological findings.

show abstract

“…Avitene® is a microfibrillar hemostatic collagen Type-I membrane derived from bovine corium. Histological evaluation after a clinical study has shown that this membrane was not clinically effective and is difficult to handle during surgery [205]. Figure 5 illustrates some clinical applications of two absorbable collagen membranes (Fig.…”

Section: Barrier Membranes For Periodontal Guided Regeneration Applicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontal disease is categorized by the destruction of periodontal tissues. Over the years, there have been several clinical techniques and material options that been investigated for periodontal defect repair/regeneration. The development of improved biomaterials for periodontal tissue engineering has significantly improved the available treatment options and their clinical results. Bone replacement graft materials, barrier membranes, various growth factors and combination of these have been used. The available bone tissue replacement materials commonly used include autografts, allografts, xenografts and alloplasts. These graft materials mostly function as osteogenic, osteoinductive and/or osteoconductive scaffolds. Polymers (natural and synthetic) are more widely used as a barrier material in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and guided bone regeneration (GBR) applications. They work on the principle of epithelial cell exclusion to allow periodontal ligament and alveolar bone cells to repopulate the defect before the normally faster epithelial cells. However, in an attempt to overcome complications related to the epithelial down-growth and/or collapse of the non-rigid barrier membrane and to maintain space, clinicians commonly use a combination of membranes with hard tissue grafts. This article aims to review various available natural tissues and biomaterial based bone replacement graft and membrane options used in periodontal regeneration applications.

show abstract

An Evaluation of New Attachment Formation Using a Microfibhllar Collagen Barrier

Cited by 42 publications

References 20 publications

Collagen Membranes: A Review

Collagen Membranes: A Review

Pathogenesis of parodontitis in rheumatic diseases

Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About