An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering

Qumer, Asif; Henderson‐Sellers, Brian

doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.002

Cited by 175 publications

(148 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

125

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A new analytical framework developed by Qumer and Henderson-Sellerscalled (4-DAT) [39]. The proposed framework was applied on six agile selected methods in addition to two traditional methods for comparison purposes.…”

Section: Miscellaneousmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agile Software Development Methodologies: Survey of Surveys

Al-Zewairi¹,

Biltawi²,

Etaiwi³

et al. 2017

JCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agile software design and development methodologies have been gaining rigorous attention in the software engineering research community since their early introduction in the mid-nineties in addition to being highly adopted by the software development industry. In the last 15 years, an excessive number of research studies have been conducted on agile methods, a great number of notable methods have been proposed and various surveys have been presented by many researchers. In this study, the authors intend to conduct a literature survey study of the surveys of the different agile methodologies ranging from January 2000 to December 2015 using an intuitive research methodology called "Compare and Review" (CR). Furthermore, these survey papers were classified into four major categories according to their area of study. Additionally, the newly proposed agile methodologies that have not been addressed yet in any other literature review were reviewed and compared in terms of where the changes that they proposed lay on the SDLC.

show abstract

Section: Miscellaneousmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agile Software Development Methodologies: Survey of Surveys

Al-Zewairi¹,

Biltawi²,

Etaiwi³

et al. 2017

JCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Communication and social interactions, such as facilitated debriefs, and individual and group conversations and dialogues, can achieve agility (Glymph, 2013). OA is communications-oriented (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2008). Agile organizations can affect OL through discussion, debate, idea exchange, and interaction between members (Worley, 2009).…”

Section: Dialogue (Dia)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking

Hamad¹,

Yozgat²

2017

10.5267/j.msl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Both organizational agility and learning capability are prerequisites for organizational survival and success. This study explores the contribution of agility practices to organizational learning capabilities at the commercial banks in Jordan. To examine the proposed model, a sample of 158 employees within top and middle managements was used. Structural Equation Modeling was conducted for assessing validity and reliability of measurement instrument, evaluating model fit, and testing hypotheses. This study recognizes agility as a key element of learning facilitators. Findings affirm the strategic value of agility and conclude that administrators working within agile organizations would be able to acquire conditions that foster learning.

show abstract

“…As a result, here the evaluation criteria are organized into the following complementary categories: Agility Evaluation Criteria, MDD Evaluation Criteria, and AMDD Evaluation Criteria. The agility and MDD evaluation criteria are selected from [2] and [18], respectively, and are slightly refined and then used. The AMDD evaluation criteria, developed as a part of this research, are discussed and explained here:…”

Section: A Evaluation Of Amdd Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agile Model Driven Development: An Intelligent Compromise

Matinnejad

2011

2011 Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Both the model-driven and agile development approaches have significantly enhanced productivity and predictability of software development in practice. Agile Model Driven Development or AMDD is an attempt to effectively bring together the fast pace of agile development and the guaranteed quality of model-driven development. Despite the proliferation of processes claim to comply with AMDD principles, there has been little academic research examining merits and demerits of such an approach. This paper first presents the underlying theoretical foundations of AMDD and then reviews, classifies and compares existing AMDD processes. The results indicate significant disparity between compared processes that implies the AMDD concepts are still in their infancy.

show abstract

An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering

Cited by 175 publications

References 15 publications

Agile Software Development Methodologies: Survey of Surveys

Agile Software Development Methodologies: Survey of Surveys

Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking

Agile Model Driven Development: An Intelligent Compromise

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About