2013
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31829965bc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Web Sites Recommended by UK NHS Consultants to Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at the First Point of Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results highlighted the dilemma that patients in China have to encounter when they are in need of more scoliosis related information. Similar to our conclusions, Welburn et al[ 9 ] also reported that the websites recommended by UK NHS Consultants were of poor quality in terms of scoliosis related information, especially the information related to conservative management methods for scoliosis, such as bracing, which has been demonstrated to effectively control the progression of scoliosis based on recent Cochrane reviews [ 20 ]. One possible explanation for the poor quality of online information is the lack of regulation of Internet based information.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results highlighted the dilemma that patients in China have to encounter when they are in need of more scoliosis related information. Similar to our conclusions, Welburn et al[ 9 ] also reported that the websites recommended by UK NHS Consultants were of poor quality in terms of scoliosis related information, especially the information related to conservative management methods for scoliosis, such as bracing, which has been demonstrated to effectively control the progression of scoliosis based on recent Cochrane reviews [ 20 ]. One possible explanation for the poor quality of online information is the lack of regulation of Internet based information.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…No academic sources were found within the first 15 websites listed on each search engine and the average DISCERN score for all websites analyzed was 27.6, which is significantly lower than that reported in the United Kingdom and Ireland [ 9 , 10 ]. The average DISCERN score reported by Wellburn et al[ 9 ] was 37.57, larger than that reported in our study since the websites collected in his study were recommended by consultants. These results highlighted the dilemma that patients in China have to encounter when they are in need of more scoliosis related information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information should be presented in a way that is acceptable and useful for a patient [10]. In a survey among patients with scoliosis and their carers, it was advised that the information should be user friendly and in plain language [11]. For NDI grades of disability have been defined, although these also differ and are based on clinical information and not the patients qualification [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, instead of the internet being a useful tool for providing comprehensive, quality information regarding AIS and treatments, research indicates that the information that is currently on the internet is poor, irrelevant, and misleading (Mathur et al, 2005;Wellburn et al, 2013). For example, studies have found that the information regarding AIS on the internet is not evidenced-based and is inaccurate (Mathur et al, 2005) and lacks information regarding how treatments work, the associated risks and benefits of treatments and how treatment choices can affect qualityof-life (Wellburn et al, 2013). Research indicates that the information acquired online can generate greater confusion and result in unrealistic patient expectations (Ahmad, Hudak, Bercovitz, Hollenberg, & Levinson, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%