2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is balanced in part by evidence that a number of regions outside of the pSTG/STS are also sensitive to these factors (c.f. Prabhakaran et al, 2006; Goldrick & Rapp, 2006; Graves et al, 2007) and directly modulate pSTG/STS activation during speech perception (Gow et al, 2008; Gow & Segawa, 2009). This raises the possibility that sensitivity to lexical properties is referred from other areas, and that the STG/STS acts as a sensory buffer where multiple information types converge to refine and perhaps normalize transient representations of wordform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is balanced in part by evidence that a number of regions outside of the pSTG/STS are also sensitive to these factors (c.f. Prabhakaran et al, 2006; Goldrick & Rapp, 2006; Graves et al, 2007) and directly modulate pSTG/STS activation during speech perception (Gow et al, 2008; Gow & Segawa, 2009). This raises the possibility that sensitivity to lexical properties is referred from other areas, and that the STG/STS acts as a sensory buffer where multiple information types converge to refine and perhaps normalize transient representations of wordform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their productions were recorded and subsequently analyzed for VOT. Similar to Prabhakaran et al's (2006) study investigating auditory word recognition, Peramunage et al's (2011) results examining spoken word production showed modulation of activity as a function of lexical density in the supramarginal and left superior temporal gryi. A similar density effect emerged in the inferior frontal and precentral gyri as well.…”
Section: Segments Features and The Lexiconmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Neither the Prabhakaran et al (2006) nor the Okada & Hickok studies (2006) showed a density effect for nonwords. These findings suggest that the locus of the neighborhood density effect was lexical, reflecting access to the lexicon, rather than prelexical, reflecting the phonotactic probabilities of possible words in the language.…”
Section: Segments Features and The Lexiconmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An EEG study shows effects of lexical information in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) and provides evidence that activity in STG is modulated through interactions with the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) (Gow et al, 2008), an area sensitive to the lexical status of an item (e. g., Prabhakaran et al, 2006). Together, the data support interactions between lexical and pre-lexical sources of information.…”
Section: Section I: Flexibility In Speech Perception: Integrating Meamentioning
confidence: 83%