2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended Teorell-Meyer-Sievers theory for membrane potential under non-isothermal conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the former, a refined model would be developed to calculate the access resistance self-consistently with higher precision. In addition, other effects, such as the temperature dependence of the surface charge density [54] or zeta potential [55], the slippage on the nanopore wall [36], the activity coefficient correction [56],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the former, a refined model would be developed to calculate the access resistance self-consistently with higher precision. In addition, other effects, such as the temperature dependence of the surface charge density [54] or zeta potential [55], the slippage on the nanopore wall [36], the activity coefficient correction [56],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the concentration increases, the sign of ψ­( r ) changes due to more counterion’s adsorption at the first layer near the walls of the membrane, as shown in the inset plot in Figure a. The other point which we should consider is the diffusion potential, DP, the difference potential of inner and outer membrane walls, which decreases with the concentration. This potential is responsible for the transportation of ions through the membrane, and its value is influenced by size and surface charge. Finally, in region II, within the membrane, the MEP increases with distance and concentration, while the slope of ψ­( r ) versus r decreases with concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the different cation transport rates of the LATP/AEP membranes were demonstrated by the diffusion results of the single salt solutions (Figure S16). With the rapid diffusion of Li ions, a crossmembrane potential could be generated, which facilitated supplementary chloride ion transport . To demonstrate the diffusion capability of the dual-channel membrane, the Li + and Cl – ion transport rate was measured and with a 24 h diffusion process of 0.1 M LiCl solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid diffusion of Li ions, a crossmembrane potential could be generated, which facilitated supplementary chloride ion transport. 53 To demonstrate the diffusion capability of the dual-channel membrane, the Li + and Cl − ion transport rate was measured and with a 24 h diffusion process of 0.1 M LiCl solution. In addition, the low-porosity LATP/AEP membrane showed the Li + ion flux of 23.0 ± 3.1 mmol•m −2 •h −1 and the Cl − ion flux of 20.4 ± 2.9 mmol•m −2 •h −1 , which were calculated to the diffusion coefficients of 5.08 × 10 −7 cm 2 •s −1 for Li + ions and 4.51 × 10 −7 cm 2 •s −1 for Cl − ions.…”
Section: Modification Of the Membranementioning
confidence: 99%