2021 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iscas51556.2021.9401412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An FPGA Implementation of Convolutional Spiking Neural Networks for Radioisotope Identification

Abstract: This paper details FPGA implementation methodology for Convolutional Spiking Neural Networks (CSNN) and applies this methodology to low-power radioisotope identification using high resolution data. A power consumption of 75 mW has been achieved on an FPGA implementation of a CSNN, with the inference accuracy of 90.62% on a synthetic dataset. The chip validation method is presented. Prototyping was accelerated by evaluating SNN parameters using SpiNNaker neuromorphic platform.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This combination is very powerful, as it harnesses the power of a convolutional filter alongside the spiking mechanism of IF or LIF neurons. When using low-power FPGA boards, as in several studies [ 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ], it is challenging to balance both the deeper convolutions and spiking mechanisms. The current study was able to overcome several of the challenges faced by other works because of the following: We hosted deeper convolutions alongside SNNs with very few parameters compared to [ 49 ] and were still able to achieve similar accuracy over the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This combination is very powerful, as it harnesses the power of a convolutional filter alongside the spiking mechanism of IF or LIF neurons. When using low-power FPGA boards, as in several studies [ 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ], it is challenging to balance both the deeper convolutions and spiking mechanisms. The current study was able to overcome several of the challenges faced by other works because of the following: We hosted deeper convolutions alongside SNNs with very few parameters compared to [ 49 ] and were still able to achieve similar accuracy over the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study was able to overcome several of the challenges faced by other works because of the following: We hosted deeper convolutions alongside SNNs with very few parameters compared to [ 49 ] and were still able to achieve similar accuracy over the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets. We employed both real-valued and Poisson distribution spikes as input encoding schemes to capture most of the information before processing them through DCSNNs, which were not used in [ 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. We tested the DCSNNs on automotive relevant datasets such as KITTI, INHA_ADAS, and INHA_KLP as opposed to just MNIST and CIFAR10, as was the case in [ 49 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the necessity of low-power implementation of source detection and identification algorithms has become apparent and recognized, to the best of our knowledge, literature on the topic is scarce. For example, Huang et al, implemented a convolutional spiking neural network based source detection algorithm on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) and achieved the overall power consumption of 75 mW [17]. However, the work lacks thorough benchmarking of the implemented algorithm, and the approach may not be easily applicable to other already existing algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%