“…The current study was able to overcome several of the challenges faced by other works because of the following: - We hosted deeper convolutions alongside SNNs with very few parameters compared to [ 49 ] and were still able to achieve similar accuracy over the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets.
- We employed both real-valued and Poisson distribution spikes as input encoding schemes to capture most of the information before processing them through DCSNNs, which were not used in [ 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].
- We tested the DCSNNs on automotive relevant datasets such as KITTI, INHA_ADAS, and INHA_KLP as opposed to just MNIST and CIFAR10, as was the case in [ 49 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].
…”