1991
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Heuristic for the Study of the Effects of Emotion on Memory

Abstract: This report contains an heuristic (a systematic set of questions) addressing issues of concern in the emotion-memory literature. Four experiments (ns of 73, 24, 160, and 34) are described in terms of the heuristic and its potential for describing the literature is examined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we strongly recommend that future investigators in this area collect and publish, or at least keep for future use, vital information about their research needed for synthesizing data across studies. Such data should include information needed to clearly characterize the study participants (e.g., age, age of first depressive episode, subtype of depression, medication status, health status; Reynolds, Lebowitz, & Kupfer, 1993); details needed to specify task variables at the encoding phase (e.g., types of materials used, encoding activity encouraged), interphase (e.g., how long between encoding and retrieval, what activity was interpolated), and test phase (e.g., recall vs. recognition); and comprehensive statistical results (e.g., intertask correlations, means, and standard deviations) (Ingram & Reed, 1986; Whissell, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we strongly recommend that future investigators in this area collect and publish, or at least keep for future use, vital information about their research needed for synthesizing data across studies. Such data should include information needed to clearly characterize the study participants (e.g., age, age of first depressive episode, subtype of depression, medication status, health status; Reynolds, Lebowitz, & Kupfer, 1993); details needed to specify task variables at the encoding phase (e.g., types of materials used, encoding activity encouraged), interphase (e.g., how long between encoding and retrieval, what activity was interpolated), and test phase (e.g., recall vs. recognition); and comprehensive statistical results (e.g., intertask correlations, means, and standard deviations) (Ingram & Reed, 1986; Whissell, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%