2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An HNRNPK-specific DNA methylation signature makes sense of missense variants and expands the phenotypic spectrum of Au-Kline syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, it may be informative to determine whether the severity of the KBGS phenotype is consistently reflected by the DNAm data. We have demonstrated this relationship for missense variants and DNAm in the HNRNPK gene associated with Au-Kline syndrome ( 30 ). In the future, DNAm profiling could be helpful in predicting pathogenicity and severity of the KBGS phenotype as we have shown for a missense ANKRD11 variant inherited from a clinically unaffected parent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Lastly, it may be informative to determine whether the severity of the KBGS phenotype is consistently reflected by the DNAm data. We have demonstrated this relationship for missense variants and DNAm in the HNRNPK gene associated with Au-Kline syndrome ( 30 ). In the future, DNAm profiling could be helpful in predicting pathogenicity and severity of the KBGS phenotype as we have shown for a missense ANKRD11 variant inherited from a clinically unaffected parent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Whereas Choufani et al (16) used a methylation bead array platform targeting ~ 850,000 CpGs for methylation pro ling, we used a NGS-based assay targeting > 2M CpGs. The difference in methodology and analytical approaches used by Choufani et al (2022) and us limits the detailed comparison of the methylation episignatures from the two conditions. Whereas Choufani et al (16) identi ed 429 statistically signi cant CpG DMPs in their AKS discovery cohort (n = 6) using a false discovery rate adjusted p-value of 0.05 and a minimum methylation difference of 10%, we employed a p-value of less than 0.01 and a more stringent minimum methylation difference of 20% and identi ed 227 DMPs in our HNRNPU-NDD cohort (n = 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that pathogenic variants in disease-causing genes can induce stable changes in DNA methylation patterns at multiple positions across the genome, referred to as episignatures. [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141] They are typically detected by conducting epigenome-wide association studies and then training binary or multi-class machine learning classifiers. 142 To date, episignatures have been described for more than 65 Mendelian neurodevelopmental disorders.…”
Section: Dna Methylation Episignatures and Epivariationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the detection of DNA methylation episignatures has gained the most popularity among epigenetic approaches for rare disease diagnosis. Several studies have shown that pathogenic variants in disease‐causing genes can induce stable changes in DNA methylation patterns at multiple positions across the genome, referred to as episignatures 131–141 . They are typically detected by conducting epigenome‐wide association studies and then training binary or multi‐class machine learning classifiers 142 .…”
Section: Dna Methylation Episignatures and Epivariationsmentioning
confidence: 99%