2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An illusion of success: The consequences of British rail privatisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interdisciplinary/Critical relates to studies that draw on more than one discipline or various strands of critical theory. Bowman () is the only article coded in this category. The study drew on economic, financial and political perspectives to examine the role of accounting numbers in rail privatisation.…”
Section: Analyses Of Recent Accounting Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary/Critical relates to studies that draw on more than one discipline or various strands of critical theory. Bowman () is the only article coded in this category. The study drew on economic, financial and political perspectives to examine the role of accounting numbers in rail privatisation.…”
Section: Analyses Of Recent Accounting Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Government subsidies to the infrastructure holder (currently NR) mean that the latter may not recover all its costs through TACs. Indirectly subsidising passenger traffic in this way enables franchises to appear more profitable than they really are, and the privatised system a 'success' (Bowman, 2015). Such unrecharged operating costs of passenger rail services need to be added to the costs appearing in the TOCs' own accounts, but…”
Section: The Data Sets Utilisedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rail track geometry is an important aspect of railway construction upon which the degradation of many other track components is closely related. It is also often as an index in track safety, maintenance and renewals tactics (Madejski, Grabczyk, 2002;Esveld, 2001;Jovanovic, 2004;Lyngby et al, 2008;Bowman, 2015;Martey, Attoh-Okine, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%