2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R)☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
501
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(509 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
501
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The eight-item Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R; Adamson et al, 2010) was used to assess cannabis use problems within the past 6 months. A sum of the eight items was taken to yield a total score, which could range from 0 to 32 (Adamson et al, 2010). Internal consistency for the CUDIT-R in the current sample was .74.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eight-item Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R; Adamson et al, 2010) was used to assess cannabis use problems within the past 6 months. A sum of the eight items was taken to yield a total score, which could range from 0 to 32 (Adamson et al, 2010). Internal consistency for the CUDIT-R in the current sample was .74.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannabis use was assessed using the revised Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT-R; Adamson et al, 2010). Cannabis use is not a variable of central interest in this study, but should be controlled for, given the associations between cannabis use and hallucinatory experiences in non-clinical populations (Kelleher & Cannon, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants indicated whether they had experienced each of the consequences in the past 6 months. Past-6-month users also completed the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test (CUDIT; Adamson et al, 2010), which is an eight-item measure used to assess symptoms of CUD. The scale has displayed adequate reliability in previous work with young adults (Finch et al, 2013;Ramo et al, 2012) as well as in our sample ( = .83).…”
Section: Other Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%