2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2932731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Faster R-CNN for Small Object Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, although we used the FRCNN architecture in the present study, we need to carefully choose the best method for achieving our goal, because deep learning technologies have recently been progressing massively [ 51 ]. In particular, FRCNN has been reported to have difficulty identifying objects from low-resolution images, due to its weak capacity to identify local texture [ 52 ]. We plan to improve the algorithm appropriately, according to the direction of our social implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, although we used the FRCNN architecture in the present study, we need to carefully choose the best method for achieving our goal, because deep learning technologies have recently been progressing massively [ 51 ]. In particular, FRCNN has been reported to have difficulty identifying objects from low-resolution images, due to its weak capacity to identify local texture [ 52 ]. We plan to improve the algorithm appropriately, according to the direction of our social implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas of future research to expand this technique include testing whether there are performance improvements for detecting elephants by including the near infrared band and testing for which other species this is already a viable monitoring technique. More broadly, deep learning methods for detecting small objects can be further improved [83,84] and large training datasets containing images of wildlife from an aerial perspective should be developed. If satellite monitoring is applied at scale then developing methods to ensure standardised and occasional ground-truthing will be required to ensure image interpretation is accurate [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning methods are categorized into two groups: CNNs and RNNs [ 4 , 5 , 11 , 13 , 16 , 20 , 42 ]. In our surveys, R-CNN and Fast R-CNN are slower than YOLO and SSD in training, while the latter is proved to be with lower accuracy [ 6 – 8 , 21 , 22 , 32 , 33 , 39 , 40 , 56 ]. Hence, training a classifier based on Faster R-CNN to conduct apple ripeness classification is regarded as an optimal method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%