eter was noted between the fluoride treatment groups. Increasing numerical improvements of %SMHR and %RER were observed in all four treatment groups over time (2, 4, and 8 h). The present in situ model is a sensitive tool to investigate intrinsic and fluoride-enhanced rehardening of eroded enamel. All three fluoride toothpastes were more efficacious than placebo, and there were no safety concerns following single dosing in this short-term in situ model. Dental erosion is described as the progressive loss of tooth substance as a result of chemical processes that, unlike those in caries pathology, do not involve bacteria [Layer, 2009;Mason, 2009]. Also unlike caries, which has seen a declining prevalence in western countries, the incidence of dental erosion has been reported to be on the increase [Truin et al., 2004;Chadwick, 2006;Toumba, 2006], and the condition has been highlighted as 'a challenge for the 21st century' [Angmar- Månsson, 2006]. The beneficial effects of fluoride dentifrices for the prevention and management of dental erosion have been evidenced in a large number of in vitro and in situ studies [Bartlett et al., 1994;Attin et al., 1998;Ganss et al., 2001;van Rijkom et al., 2003;Ganss et al., 2004;Hughes et al., 2004;
Key Words Dental erosion · Fluoride · Gel-to-foam toothpaste · In situ model · Surface microhardness
AbstractThis single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, fourtreatment, four-period crossover study compared the enamel remineralization effects of low-and medium-abrasivity gel-to-foam toothpastes and a reference toothpaste (all 1,450 ppm fluoride as NaF) versus placebo toothpaste (0 ppm fluoride) using a short-term in situ erosion model. Subjects (n = 56) wearing a palatal appliance holding acidsoftened bovine enamel specimens brushed their teeth with the test toothpastes. Thereafter, the specimens were removed for analysis of percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and percent relative erosion resistance (%RER) at 2, 4, and 8 h. Both low-and medium-abrasivity gel-to-foam fluoride toothpastes and the reference toothpaste provided significantly greater %SMHR than placebo at all assessment time points (all p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference of %SMHR was observed between the fluoride treatment groups at any time point. Similarly, all fluoride products provided significantly superior %RER versus placebo (all p < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference of this param-