2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38536-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Knapsack Solver for Column Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated in [21] and [11,Lemma 5], non-dominated tuples (p, s, k) can be removed in linear time in the number of tuples if the tuples are different and sorted by profit. This is the case because every tuple in D (k) is stored in an array sorted according to the corresponding ξ.…”
Section: Corollary 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in [21] and [11,Lemma 5], non-dominated tuples (p, s, k) can be removed in linear time in the number of tuples if the tuples are different and sorted by profit. This is the case because every tuple in D (k) is stored in an array sorted according to the corresponding ξ.…”
Section: Corollary 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We [20] have extended our algorithm to the Unbounded Knapsack Profit with Inversely Proportional Profits (UKPIP) introduced in [11]. Here, several knapsack sizes 0 < c 1 < .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in [21] and [11,Lemma 5], non-dominated tuples (p, s, k) can be removed in linear time in the number of tuples if the tuples are different and sorted by profit. This is the case because every tuple in D (k) is stored in an array sorted according to the corresponding ξ.…”
Section: Remark 25mentioning
confidence: 99%