“…At present, the studies on this subject are mainly cross-sectional, through the use of a questionnaire, and are mainly focused on four broad dimensions that are associated with the safety of the patient and the quality of care, considering the possible adverse effects experienced during the process of care derived from the different disruptive behaviors. These dimensions are: Motives and prevalence of disruptive behavior in the health context where the individual factors, the environmental factors, the organizational factors, and the social factors, are relevant, with important correlations observed between abuse and gender, physical abuse and position, and physical abuse and level of education that have generated at least one observed disruptive behavior [ 30 , 32 , 33 ]; places and moments in which these disruptive behaviors are produced; in this dimension, we highlight the recording of disruptive behavior at emergency services, surgery rooms, and ICU, considered as high complexity due to the variability of the processes and level of care, linked with the physical and emotional workload [ 20 , 23 ]; the types and element characteristics of disruptive behavior: the studies underlined the aspects associated with “intimidation” and “hostility” related with workload and teamwork [ 26 , 34 ]; the strategies and protocols: in most cases, the studies indicated the implementation of a proactive culture by the health professionals in the development of competences in patient safety, team work, and the making of decisions, and by the health institutions, for providing a functional and structural organization for the development of this culture, to promote human qualities at work [ 8 , 28 , 35 , 36 ].…”